2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Visfatin (Adipocytokine) Biomarker in Oral Health and Diseases among Nonobese Indian Population: A Proteomic Assay

Abstract: Visfatin is an adipocytokine and a potential biomarker encoded by the nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase gene. It belongs to the nicotinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase family and involved in various metabolic processes and aging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of visfatin biomarker in oral diseases like periodontitis. A total of 60 patients (20–50 years) were included in this study, and they were divided into three groups. Group I consisted of 20 subjects with healthy periodontium, group … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reading the abstract of the remaining 48 studies, 37 of them were extracted as initially eligible studies. By examining full texts, 22 articles were finally included in the meta-analysis ( Pradeep et al, 2011 ; Raghavendra et al, 2012 ; Xu et al, 2023 ; Pradeep et al, 2012 ; Tabari et al, 2014 ; Abolfazli et al, 2015 ; Ghallab, Amr & Shaker, 2015 ; Mohamed et al, 2015 ; Tabari et al, 2015 ; Özcan et al, 2016a , 2016b , 2017 ; Tabari et al, 2018 ; Bahammam & Attia, 2018 ; Mopidevi et al, 2019 ; Rezaei et al, 2019 ; Çetiner et al, 2019 ; Paul et al, 2020 ; Saljoughi, Nasri & Bayani, 2020 ; Saseendran et al, 2021 ; Coutinho et al, 2021 ; Bengi et al, 2024 ). The reasons for inclusion in the full-text selection are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reading the abstract of the remaining 48 studies, 37 of them were extracted as initially eligible studies. By examining full texts, 22 articles were finally included in the meta-analysis ( Pradeep et al, 2011 ; Raghavendra et al, 2012 ; Xu et al, 2023 ; Pradeep et al, 2012 ; Tabari et al, 2014 ; Abolfazli et al, 2015 ; Ghallab, Amr & Shaker, 2015 ; Mohamed et al, 2015 ; Tabari et al, 2015 ; Özcan et al, 2016a , 2016b , 2017 ; Tabari et al, 2018 ; Bahammam & Attia, 2018 ; Mopidevi et al, 2019 ; Rezaei et al, 2019 ; Çetiner et al, 2019 ; Paul et al, 2020 ; Saljoughi, Nasri & Bayani, 2020 ; Saseendran et al, 2021 ; Coutinho et al, 2021 ; Bengi et al, 2024 ). The reasons for inclusion in the full-text selection are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a positive correlation between visfatin levels in GCF and periodontal indexes (PD, AL, PLI, BI), consistent with the findings of other studies [ 23 , 24 , 32 ]. GCF and serum visfatin levels increased in both periodontitis and gingivitis patients compared to healthy controls, and the mean salivary visfatin levels also increased with the severity of periodontal tissue destruction [ 33 , 34 ]. Non-surgical periodontal treatment significantly improved the periodontal conditions of patients with periodontitis, leading to reduced PD, increased clinical attachment levels, and decreased release of inflammatory mediators from local tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After screening the title and abstract of these studies by two authors independently, 58 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and the full text of the remaining 33 studies was examined. Finally, sixteen studies [16,17,19,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] were included in the meta-analysis. Seventeen studies that were impossible to include in the meta-analysis are presented in S2 Table with details and reasons [14,15,18,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] and can be considered as qualitative data.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen studies that were impossible to include in the meta-analysis are presented in S2 Table with details and reasons [14,15,18,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] and can be considered as qualitative data. In most studies, periodontal diseases were classified based on the 1999 classification for periodontal diseases and conditions [51] and 4 studies [34,[47][48][49] based on the 2018 classification [52]. One of the studies analyzed biopsy samples, one studied saliva, one studied saliva and serum without providing quantitative data, and one studied GCF.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%