1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf03009863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of vasopressors in the management of hypotension induced by spinal and epidural anaesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
52
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravenous infusion of vasopressors is associated with better control of arterial pressure and fewer maternal side-effects compared with intermittent intravenous bolus doses [28,29] or intramuscular administration [30]. Prophylactic administration of ephedrine is associated with a higher incidence of fetal acidaemia [13].…”
Section: ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravenous infusion of vasopressors is associated with better control of arterial pressure and fewer maternal side-effects compared with intermittent intravenous bolus doses [28,29] or intramuscular administration [30]. Prophylactic administration of ephedrine is associated with a higher incidence of fetal acidaemia [13].…”
Section: ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Husaini and Russell 1998;Morgan 1994;Turkoz et al 2002) Ephedrine, by beta 1 stimulation, causes an increase of cardiac output and indirectly effects vasoconstriction through the release of norepinephrine. Repeated administration of ephedrine, however, diminishes the vasoconstrictive effect, since the norepinephrine supply dwindles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used as a bolus, the recommended doses have varied widely from 20 to 100 lg. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Current practice at our institution is to give 100-lg bolus doses to maintain systolic blood pressure at control levels, which still results in about a 10-15% incidence of pre-delivery hypotension (systolic pressure <80% of control value) in our patients. Unfortunately, a dose-response study is not available in the literature, so it is impossible to know whether this dose is the most appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%