2010
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00654.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of V1 Surround Suppression in MT Motion Integration

Abstract: Tsui JMG, Hunter JN, Born RT, Pack CC. The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration. J Neurophysiol 103: 3123-3138, 2010. First published March 24, 2010 doi:10.1152/jn.00654.2009. Neurons in the primate extrastriate cortex are highly selective for complex stimulus features such as faces, objects, and motion patterns. One explanation for this selectivity is that neurons in these areas carry out sophisticated computations on the outputs of lower-level areas such as primary visual cortex (V1), wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
80
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simoncelli and Heeger's model (1998) is not the only one that can emulate pattern cells' responses to plaids. For instance, end-stopping V1 neurons can be exploited to determine the average direction of plaid (Pack et al 2003;Tsui et al 2010). Alternatively, the cascade model, in which V1 neurons are subject to gain control and their responses summed by MT neurons, with an accelerating nonlinearity output, can also predict pattern cells' responses to plaids (Rust et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simoncelli and Heeger's model (1998) is not the only one that can emulate pattern cells' responses to plaids. For instance, end-stopping V1 neurons can be exploited to determine the average direction of plaid (Pack et al 2003;Tsui et al 2010). Alternatively, the cascade model, in which V1 neurons are subject to gain control and their responses summed by MT neurons, with an accelerating nonlinearity output, can also predict pattern cells' responses to plaids (Rust et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of its precise functional interpretation, the compressive nonlinear operation could plausibly be implemented through inhibitory interactions among MT neurons with similar receptive field positions and stimulus selectivities; a similar "selfnormalization" operation at the level of V1 has been posited to be of primary importance in explaining selectivity in MT cells (18,34,57). An alternate explanation is synaptic depression at the level of the MT-MST synapse (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stated in more general terms, the stimulus selectivity of the hierarchical MST model is too similar to that of its inputs, and there appears to be no spatial arrangement of inputs that can bring this model into closer agreement with the data. This result suggests that MST selectivity requires a nonlinear operation that transforms the output of one area before summation by the next (2,18,34); indeed such a mechanism has been proposed in other contexts throughout the primate visual system (3,5,30,35). We therefore examined the consequences of adding a nonlinearity (Fig.…”
Section: Nonlinear Integration Is Necessary To Explain Mst Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is possible that the nonlinear interaction of overlapping stimuli occurs in the inputs to MT from the primary visual cortex (V1), where contrast normalization is an important feature (Geisler and Albrecht 1992;Rust et al 2005;Tsui et al 2010). Sheliga et al (2006Sheliga et al ( , 2008 have proposed the primary visual cortex as the locus of the local interaction of multiple stimuli for ocular following.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%