2000
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Uncertainty in Investment: An Examination of Competing Investment Models Using Commercial Real Estate Data

Abstract: Neoclassical investment decision criteria suggest that only the systematic component of total risk affects the rate of investment, as channeled through the built‐asset price. Alternatively, option‐based investment models suggest a direct role for total uncertainty in investment decisionmaking. To sort out uncertainty's role in investment, we specify and empirically estimate a structural model of asset‐market equilibrium. Commercial real estate time‐series data with two distinct measures of asset price and unce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CAPOZZA AND SICK (1994) combined option theory with monocentric urban economic theory. GRENADIER (1995) uses real option theory to explain the cyclical behavior of the real estate market, while HOLLAND (HOLLAND et al 2000) explained cyclical dynamics or the real estate market using a general equilibrium model obtained using the real option. In this context, the waiting option shows an important role in the decisional process of the market player.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAPOZZA AND SICK (1994) combined option theory with monocentric urban economic theory. GRENADIER (1995) uses real option theory to explain the cyclical behavior of the real estate market, while HOLLAND (HOLLAND et al 2000) explained cyclical dynamics or the real estate market using a general equilibrium model obtained using the real option. In this context, the waiting option shows an important role in the decisional process of the market player.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest rate, expected rental growth, systematic risk and total asset price uncertainty are traditionally modeled as being embedded in built asset price, and therefore are often omitted in supply equation specifications (see, e.g., Wheaton (1987), Wheaton and Torto (1990) for applications to commercial real estate). In contrast, we include explicit measures of these variables in our specification, as Holland et al (2000) and Yoshida (1999) provide evidence that these variables exert a price-independent effect on irreversible investment vis-à-vis the option value of delay.…”
Section: Iia Economic Setting and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For applications to commercial real estate, see Holland, Ott, and Riddiough (2000) and Sivitanidou and Sivitanides (2000). 4 For estimates of gestation lags from investment models, see Oliner, Rudebusch, and Sichel (1995), Zhou (2000), Koeva (2001), Millar (2005a), and Del Boca et al (2008); for estimates from dynamic factor demand models, see Palm, Peeters, and Pfann (1993) and Peeters (1998); and for estimates from business cycle models, see Altug (1989) and Christiano and Vigfusson (2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%