2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of topography and lateral velocity heterogeneities on near-source scattering and ground-motion variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that for the frequency range considered here, scattering due to topography and a rather smooth 3D Earth model is generally insufficient to generate realistically scattered waves [Imperatori and Mai , 2015], thereby affecting the waveform misfit. Note, however, that the farthest recording (at SAL) demonstrates a very consistent overall waveform character, including the coda waves, as regional wavepropagation effects dominate (e.g.…”
Section: Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We think that for the frequency range considered here, scattering due to topography and a rather smooth 3D Earth model is generally insufficient to generate realistically scattered waves [Imperatori and Mai , 2015], thereby affecting the waveform misfit. Note, however, that the farthest recording (at SAL) demonstrates a very consistent overall waveform character, including the coda waves, as regional wavepropagation effects dominate (e.g.…”
Section: Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To capture the effect of seismicity considering all the above-listed controlling factors, the most representative models can be derived via numerical simulations (e.g., Imperatori & Mai, 2015;Lee et al, 2009Lee et al, , 2008. However, such approaches have high computational costs.…”
Section: Reviews Of Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, significant progress has been made in modeling synthetic ground motions. With the advance of modern computing power, studies such as Bydlon et al (), Graves and Pitarka (), Mai et al (), Taborda et al (), Imperatori and Mai (), Frankel et al (), Wirth et al (), Withers, Olsen, Day, and Shi,(), Withers, Olsen, Shi, and Day, (), Olsen et al (), Graves and Pitarka (), Andrews and Ma (), Hartzell et al (), Pitarka et al (), Pitarka et al (), and Moschetti et al () have incorporated increasingly accurate physics into simulations. Some of these improvements include explicitly accounting for complex rupture processes and the propagation of waves through realistic 3‐D crustal structure to simulate ground motions at a wider range of frequencies for a variety of end‐use cases (from assessing regional seismic hazard related to basin amplification to better understanding the role of anelasticity in nuclear monitoring).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%