2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference disciplines provide theoretical and methodological foundations and are typically highly cited by other disciplines (Serenko & Bontis, 2013b). Being considered a reference discipline also provides a form of legitimacy for HRD in that other fields of study see the knowledge presented by HRD as being “worth referencing” (Kjaergaard & Vendelo, 2015, p. 138). Today, although the field of HRD is a vibrant and productive discipline, it is only on the cusp of becoming a reference discipline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference disciplines provide theoretical and methodological foundations and are typically highly cited by other disciplines (Serenko & Bontis, 2013b). Being considered a reference discipline also provides a form of legitimacy for HRD in that other fields of study see the knowledge presented by HRD as being “worth referencing” (Kjaergaard & Vendelo, 2015, p. 138). Today, although the field of HRD is a vibrant and productive discipline, it is only on the cusp of becoming a reference discipline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these advantages include being able to outline the discipline’s evolution of research and being able to present a historical representation of that evolution. Kjaergaard and Vendelo (2015) identified that extending one’s theoretical base was one means of increasing the number of citations from outside the discipline. Further identifying the field’s theoretical base, as proposed in the current article through theoretical literature reviews, would aid in extending HRD’s theoretical base for other disciplines to replicate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most influential HCI works have been attempts to bring new theoretical insights to the field, (e.g., Bødker, 1991;Carroll, 1991;Dourish, 2001;Nardi, 1996;Winograd & Flores, 1986 However, these efforts have not ensured the development of a solid and widely accepted theoretical foundation for HCI. This situation is perhaps similar to that in the related field of Information Systems, which some see as unsuccessful in developing sustainable and widely used theory (Kjaergaard & Vendelø, 2015). In HCI, the usefulness of the original information processing psychology perspective was questioned early in the history of the field (Carroll & Campbell, 1986), and this perspective has never realized its promise of being a general theory of HCI (Clemmensen, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Should HCI researchers be considered theory makers or theory users? Kjaergaard and Vendelø (2015) found that Information Systems (IS) researchers studying sensemaking theory often used this theory without explaining it or providing substantial theoretical background or discussion. They concluded that IS research is mainly concerned with empirical phenomena, pays little attention to theory construction and development, and that therefore IS is less likely to gain recognition as a reference discipline for other disciplines.…”
Section: Theory Use Vs Theory Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of sense-making is defined by Weick (1995) as a process of making sense and assigning meaning to events in the environment. Similarly Kjaergaard and Vendelø (2015) defined sense-making as: "the process through which people work to understand issues or events that are novel, ambiguous, confusing, or in some other way violate expectations".…”
Section: Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%