2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of sky conditions on gross primary production in a mixed deciduous forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
95
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
95
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In most LUE models to date, the influences of these factors on LUE are considered through the use of various scalars defined with empirical functions and coefficients [11,17,18]. Such simplification for LUE estimation definitely induces considerable uncertainties in calculated GPP [19][20][21][22][23]. Proper determination of this parameter is a prerequisite and also a challenge for calculating GPP using remote sensing data and LUE models at regional and global scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most LUE models to date, the influences of these factors on LUE are considered through the use of various scalars defined with empirical functions and coefficients [11,17,18]. Such simplification for LUE estimation definitely induces considerable uncertainties in calculated GPP [19][20][21][22][23]. Proper determination of this parameter is a prerequisite and also a challenge for calculating GPP using remote sensing data and LUE models at regional and global scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in the forest canopy, lower leaves are normally light-limited on a clear day when light is mostly direct, while diffuse light penetrates deeper into the forest canopy (Hollinger et al, 1994;Oliphant et al, 2011). Second, relative to direct, diffuse light is distributed across more leaves, leading to lower light saturation and photoinhibition in upper canopy leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancillary and biological data include soil moisture and temperature, leaf area index (LAI) and vegetation height (h) were also acquired. A summary of the sites including locations, climate conditions, vegetation types, vegetation and soil parameters as well as study periods is listed in Table 1 [49][50][51][52][54][55][56][57], and soil moisture conditions during the study period for each site are shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Study Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four sites within the AmeriFlux network were used in this study to validate the model performance, including one deciduous broadleaf forest site (Morgan Monroe State Forest, US_MMS) [49], one woody savannas site (Flagstaff Managed Forest, US_Fmf) [50], one grassland site (Vaira Ranch, US_Var) [51], and one cropland site (Bondville, US_Bo1) [52]. For each site, continuous records of half-hourly meteorological and latent heat flux measurements from eddy covariance (EC) towers were obtained from the AmeriFlux Web site [53].…”
Section: Study Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%