2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-010-0067-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Sensation in Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Nasal Patency

Abstract: To assess if sensation of nasal mucosa affect the subjective sensation of nasal patency. This is a case control study with 50 patients, using 2% lignocaine as the active drug and normal saline as the placebo (2 groups of 25 patients each). Each subject had 2 ml of solution sprayed into the test nose. These subjects had no prior nasal symptoms, allergy or surgery. They were evaluated subjectively using Likert scale and objectively by acoustic rhinometry before and after lignocaine or normal saline. The patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expansion of ADSCs in vitro will increase the rate of survival of transplanted cells, and improve the revADSCsularization of transplanted cells, decrease the rate of absorption, liquefaction, and fat cell infection for a successful single transplant shaping effect [ 8 – 10 ]. Patients given this treatment experience an improvement of symptoms associated with dryness of the nasal cavity and contradictory nasal resistance [ 11 ]. Although contradictory nasal resistance indicates that patients feel a subjective nasal obstruction, it is not consistent with nasal examinations that find substantially widened nasal cavity volumes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion of ADSCs in vitro will increase the rate of survival of transplanted cells, and improve the revADSCsularization of transplanted cells, decrease the rate of absorption, liquefaction, and fat cell infection for a successful single transplant shaping effect [ 8 – 10 ]. Patients given this treatment experience an improvement of symptoms associated with dryness of the nasal cavity and contradictory nasal resistance [ 11 ]. Although contradictory nasal resistance indicates that patients feel a subjective nasal obstruction, it is not consistent with nasal examinations that find substantially widened nasal cavity volumes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic rhinometry detects acoustic signals reflected from the wall of the nasal cavity and calculates the minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) and nasal volume (NV) of the nose [7]. However, the results of rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry do not correlate well with subjective assessments, especially among healthy individuals [8][9][10]. The objective assessment of PR patients remains controversial, and few studies have objectively examined the difference between groups with and without a sensation of nasal congestion with PR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%