2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of self-regulation in corporate governance: evidence and implications from The Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
2
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
87
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The provisions of the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange in 1997 allow a company to have two of the three takeover defenses (certificates, protective preferred shares and, priority shares) (De Jong et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Shareholders Passivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 The provisions of the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange in 1997 allow a company to have two of the three takeover defenses (certificates, protective preferred shares and, priority shares) (De Jong et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Shareholders Passivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "structuur regime" is viewed as one of the most important anti-takeover defenses (Kabir et al, 1997;Van Oijen, 2000;Van Ees et al, 2003;De Jong et al, 2004a), since the supervisory board is granted the rights previously held by shareholders (see above).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Jong et al (2004) provide more discussion of this system and its effects on share value. For our study, the implication is that if dividend policy is an effective means of reducing the agency costs of management-ownership separation, then dividends should be particularly important for Dutch shareholders, since they have very little other power to exercise over management.…”
Section: G Agency Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with previous studies (Daske, Hail, Leuz, & Verdi, 2008;Black, Jang, & Kim, 2006;Lang & Stulz, 1994;Morck, Shleifer, & Vishny, 1988;Fisher & McGowan, 1983), we employed TOBINSQ as a proxy for firm value in order to capture expected changes in future cash flow. From a review of the literature (Lang, Lins, & Maffett, 2012;Abel & Eberly, 2011;Eltayeb, 2011;Black et al, 2006;DeJong, Mertens, & Wasley, 2005;Chung, Wright, & Kedia, 2003;Allayannis & Weston, 2001), this study includes four control variables from a review of the literature to control for the financial condition of a company: ROA, GROWTH, DE, and FC. We expected a positive association between firm value and financial performance with the exception of leverage (DE).…”
Section: Disclosure Of Materials Information and Corporate Social Respmentioning
confidence: 99%