The Role of Scientists in Lithuanian Energy Security Discourse Formation

Abstract

The aim of the article is to investigate the participation of scientists in the energy security discourse. The empirical research was carried out on the basis of qualitative access while conducting semi-structured interviews with representatives from different branches of science. As the results of the analysis show, despite the strained relations between scientific knowledge and power, Lithuanian scientists do not succeed in converting scientific knowledge into power. Even though scientists have enough knowledge, it is not transformed into power relations due to an existing specific context and the passive role of scientists themselves. Emerging decision-makers' efforts to eliminate scientists from Lithuanian energy security discourse formation pushes the latter into the vague situation in which it is difficult to expand their share of expectations. Analyses of the scientific discourse show that scientists interpret the energy events in a broader context: while analysing the processes and specific projects that seek to improve energy security, they notice a more comprehensive view and manage to identify advantages, disadvantages and uncertainties of the latter. While marking out the peculiarities of energy security discourse, it may be claimed that the role of the scientists is not significant; realizing the development of energy system there has not created an institutional mechanism for

Seeing the unseen: The Chernobyl imprint on the Hungarian public sphere

“…Findings of these analyses were complementary to those of the Lithuanian and Polish media (Genys, ; Wagner et al, ). Similarities in political traditions, social and media history, and the interpretation of the media's role provided an explanation of these findings.…”

“…Findings of these analyses were complementary to those of the Lithuanian and Polish media (Genys, 2013;Wagner et al, 2016).…”

“…The International Energy Agency defines energy security as “the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price” (International Energy Agency, ). In political discourse, energy security is linked to the concept of energy independence or self‐reliance, highlighting security issues as a matter of national priority (Genys, ). Meanwhile, the government communication packages on nuclear energy refer exclusively to the development of Hungarian nuclear capabilities through the extension of the Paks nuclear power plant.…”

Energetinio saugumo sociologija : teorija ir praktika

“…Nors dalis didžiųjų Europos valstybių branduolinės energetikos sąmoningai atsisako 121 , vis tiek kai kuriose šalyse branduolinės energetikos optimizmas neblėsta, pavyzdžiui, Indijoje, Kinijoje, kaimyninėse Baltarusijoje, Ukrainoje, Rusijoje. 122 Nėra jis galutinai išblėsęs ir Lietuvoje. Branduolinė energetika Lietuvoje sulaukia bene daugiausia mokslininkų dėmesio.…”

“…Kaip esame minėję (Genys 2013), mokslininkams Lietuvoje sudarytos gana palankios sąlygos plėtoti tyrimus ir mokslinę veiklą pirmąja prasme, tačiau kur kas didesnė neapibrėžtis egzistuoja kalbant apie antrąją.…”