2014
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.896368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of probe trial distractors in the production/removal of the spatial negative priming effect

Abstract: In spatial negative priming (SNP) tasks, trials are presented in pairs; first the 'prime', and then the 'probe'. Target and/or distractor events appear on both trials and probe target reaction time is significantly lengthened when it arises at a former distractor-occupied location (ignored-repetition [IR] trial), relative to when it appears at a new location (control [CO] trial). This latency inequality, which is not inevitable, defines the SNP effect. Here, we examined the influence of prime and probe trial d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, current models of visuospatial negative priming assume that inhibitory information attached to the prime distractor is stored in a representation that is retrieved by feature repetitions at the time of the probe (e.g., Buckolz, Edgar, et al, 2012;Haworth, Buckolz, & Kajaste, 2014;Neill, Valdes, Terry, & Gorfein, 1992;Tipper, 2001). If comparable processing occurs in auditory spatial negative priming, at least two explanations for the absence of inhibitory after-effects can be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this vein, current models of visuospatial negative priming assume that inhibitory information attached to the prime distractor is stored in a representation that is retrieved by feature repetitions at the time of the probe (e.g., Buckolz, Edgar, et al, 2012;Haworth, Buckolz, & Kajaste, 2014;Neill, Valdes, Terry, & Gorfein, 1992;Tipper, 2001). If comparable processing occurs in auditory spatial negative priming, at least two explanations for the absence of inhibitory after-effects can be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%