The Role of Private Military Companies in US-Africa Policy

Abstract

This article discusses the increasing use of private military companies (PMCs) in United States’ security policy in Africa, and examines this phenomenon in relation to the US’ various military training programmes on the continent. We argue that the increasing use of PMCs in US security policy has evolved due to two critical and mutually dependent developments; African state weakness and resource stringency on the one hand, and the US's overwhelming security commitments around the world, combined with military downsizing, on the other. The article further argues that the involvement of PMCs is to a large extent informed by US concerns about access to African resources, especially oil, in the face of stiff competition from China. We conclude that the increasing US engagement in Africa is highly militaristic and state-centric, and that it is primarily conditioned by US strategic interests and does not necessarily reflect African security concerns: human security for development.

Theoretical Approach to Understanding the Nature of Private Military and Security Companies

“…The few scholars who have attempted to explain the privatisation of peacekeeping do so through different analytical lenses, and draw on a variety of intellectual tool kits, epistemological and methodological orientations. 65 The debate would be enriched by bringing in perspectives from other disciplines like confl ict/peace studies, sociology, criminology and psychology, which is not to say that the economic, political and legal discourses that analysts in the fi eld largely draw upon are not helpful. …”

Obama’s Africa Policy: The Limits of Symbolic Power

“…Africans are very protective of their hard-won sovereignty, and they regard the establishment of AFRICOM as divisive and a threat to regional and continental unity. Based on their postcolonial experiences, they don’t trust the military as a partner in development, and fear mission creep for AFRICOM and the militarization and securitization of economic relations with the U.S. 6 The growing uses by the U.S. and other donor countries of private military companies that lack transparency and accountability give further cause for concern (see Aning, Jaye, & Atuobi 2008). Moreover, African critics point out, authoritarian African regimes are taking advantage of the U.S. antiterrorism crusade, as they did in the past with anticommunism, to crack down on domestic dissent and prodemocracy activists.…”

Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century

“…A key example can be found in Liberia, where the US contracted DynCorp International to restructure and rebuild the country's military sector (McFate, 2008). Similarly, in Nigeria, MPRI has been involved in an extensive US-funded project to professionalize the military forces (Aning et al, 2008). International private military actors are thus still actively involved on the African continent, and this in turn raises important questions about accountability, transparency and the relationship of these companies to both their home and host states.…”