2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-012-0854-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Polysorbate 80 and HPβCD at the Air-Water Interface of IgG Solutions

Abstract: The results confirm surface displacement as the stabilization mechanism of polysorbate 80, but refute the frequently held opinion, that HPβCD stabilizes proteins against aggregation at the air-water interface in a manner comparable to non-ionic surfactants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the results of this study and on previous studies performed in our lab regarding the stabilization of proteins using HPßCD, one can conclude that high‐concentration HPßCD is probably not a viable option to stabilize high‐concentration MAb formulations, and that polysorbate 80 represents a better option, so long its degradation issue is controlled. Additionally, the observed differences regarding the effect of HPßCD on the stability of IgG A and IgG B point to the different cyclodextrin interaction with the proteins, probably because of differences in structure, surface distribution of hydrophobic amino acids, and/or charge pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On the basis of the results of this study and on previous studies performed in our lab regarding the stabilization of proteins using HPßCD, one can conclude that high‐concentration HPßCD is probably not a viable option to stabilize high‐concentration MAb formulations, and that polysorbate 80 represents a better option, so long its degradation issue is controlled. Additionally, the observed differences regarding the effect of HPßCD on the stability of IgG A and IgG B point to the different cyclodextrin interaction with the proteins, probably because of differences in structure, surface distribution of hydrophobic amino acids, and/or charge pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, it causes mechanical perturbation of the interface, thereby increasing the probability of intermolecular protein-protein interactions as well as desorption of aggregated species into bulk solution. 31,32 The propensity of protein molecules to accumulate at phase boundaries makes the air-liquid interfacial stress the predominant stress factor during shaking. Nevertheless, cavitation and solid-liquid interfaces are also detrimental to the physical stability of proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactants are often included as stabilizers against aggregation in therapeutic protein formulations, and they generally are thought to inhibit aggregation by reducing protein adsorption to various interfaces 5–8,11. Other protection mechanisms may be protein specific 4–6,12,13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%