2011
DOI: 10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2011.08.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Photodocumentation in Surveillance Cystoscopy for Bladder Cancer

Abstract: PURPOSE:To determine if the combination of photodocumentation and electronic medical record keeping led to changes in the management of suspicious lesions in patients with bladder cancer undergoing surveillance cystoscopy. METHODS:We reviewed the charts of all patients undergoing surveillance cystoscopy for bladder cancer during a 15-month period. We evaluated patients who had photodocumentation of bladder lesions in our electronic medical record (EPIC). Baseline demographics, surveillance data, and biopsy res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, written surgical reports are the main method (77%) used to communicate endoscopic findings between urologists for further surveillance referral -significantly more in the inpatient setting. Numerous studies, however, have described written reports and the bladder diagram as suboptimal and suggest they are not only a major limitation for patient follow-up and treatment but may also play a role in the high recurrence rates [5,6,[21][22][23]. The current documentation approach lacks anatomical accuracy due to the inter-and intra-urologist variability related to the diagram and interpretation of macroscopic findings [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, written surgical reports are the main method (77%) used to communicate endoscopic findings between urologists for further surveillance referral -significantly more in the inpatient setting. Numerous studies, however, have described written reports and the bladder diagram as suboptimal and suggest they are not only a major limitation for patient follow-up and treatment but may also play a role in the high recurrence rates [5,6,[21][22][23]. The current documentation approach lacks anatomical accuracy due to the inter-and intra-urologist variability related to the diagram and interpretation of macroscopic findings [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current documentation approach lacks anatomical accuracy due to the inter-and intra-urologist variability related to the diagram and interpretation of macroscopic findings [5]. To overcome these challenges, a registration/navigation system [5], photo documentation [23], and 3D reconstruction of cystoscopic videos have been proposed Urol Int 2020;104:410-416 DOI: 10.1159/000506653 [6,21]. Such strategies would facilitate clinical history reconstruction, as an increase in time from the initial presentation makes it progressively more difficult and time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%