2020
DOI: 10.1159/000506653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Standards in the Endoscopic Management of Bladder Cancer: A Survey Evaluation among Urologists in German-Speaking Countries

Abstract: Introduction: To assess the current diagnostic, treatment, and documentation strategies for bladder cancer (BC) in German-speaking countries. Materials and Methods: A 14-item web-based survey was distributed among members of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Associations of Urology, addressing physicians who perform cystoscopies and transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURB). Results: The survey was responded to by 308 of 5,564 urologists with a mean age of 49.5 years (response rate: 5.5%). The majority of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still not used widely because of the expensive equipment and recurring cost of a fluorescence agent. One survey from German-speaking countries reported that WLI was only performed by 60.2% of practitioners, with additional PDD performed by 36.8% ( 69 ). In a large Chinese study comprising 14,260 patients, around 74.3% of the patients were diagnosed by WLI alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still not used widely because of the expensive equipment and recurring cost of a fluorescence agent. One survey from German-speaking countries reported that WLI was only performed by 60.2% of practitioners, with additional PDD performed by 36.8% ( 69 ). In a large Chinese study comprising 14,260 patients, around 74.3% of the patients were diagnosed by WLI alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, due to the relative short follow-up period of 9 months no long-term findings have been evaluated; nevertheless, the main purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of the initial cystoscopy rather than the long-term outcomes of hematuria that have been well described in several other studies [1, 11]. Third, the cystoscopy findings were described by different urologists; thus, there may have been inconsistencies in diagnosis or treatment plan based on the experience and preference of the different urologists as encountered in other countries [23]. Some of the nonspecific changes seen in the bladder as well as the nondiagnostic nature of some of the procedures might be a direct result of the short time to cystoscopy from the onset of the acute hematuria episode (median of 3 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main limitations of this study, besides its retrospective design itself, was the way used to derive the degree of transurethral resection from retrospective review operative reports which combined with the involvement of 34 surgeons over the study period prevented properly standardizing the definition of macroscopically complete resection. Improvement of the way TURBT is described in operative reports needs to be improved as recently emphasized [26]. We did not review the charts of all TURBT performed over the study period, and we were then not able to assess the possible harms of maximal TURBT such as intraperitoneal bladder perforation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%