The role of perceived behavioural control in the constraint-negotiation process: the case of solo travel

Chung, Jin Young; Baik, Hye-Jin; Lee, Choong‐Ki

doi:10.1080/02614367.2016.1190780

Cited by 38 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another interesting finding is that habit constraint had negative effects on both cognitive negotiation and behavior negotiation, which was in contrast with the assumption in HCM and the findings of past research (e.g., Chung et al, 2017;Hubbard & Mannell, 2001). As well, social support did not help to weaken the indirect effect of habit constraint but intensified it.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 83%

“…In an effort to explore the relationship between constraints, negotiation, motivation, and participation, Hubbard and Mannell (2001) proposed four competing models, among which the constraint-effect-mitigation model (i.e., negotiation as mediator between constraint and participation) best fit the empirical data. This model has since been applied in different contexts (e.g., Chung, Baik, & Lee, 2017;Jun & Kyle, 2011;Lyu & Oh, 2014;Son et al, 2008;White, 2008) and has proved to be effective with sufficient empirical evidence. As hypothesized in both the HCM and CEM models, constraints induce negotiation strategies, which then promote participation intentions.…”

Section: The Mediation Of Constraint Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Senior's travel constraint, negotiation strategy and travel intention: Examining the role of social support

Chen

Dai

et al. 2020

Journal of Tourism Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores how travel constraints influence seniors' travel decision. By including social support for travel as a moderator in the hierarchical constraint model, we examined the effects of travel constraints, social support, and negotiation strategies on seniors' travel intentions. Face-to-face questionnaire interviews were conducted with Chinese seniors. The results were in accordance with the hierarchical constraint model in general, but also revealed some interesting findings: (a) for Chinese seniors, intrapersonal constraint (health constraint, habit constraint) and interpersonal constraint played a vital role in influencing travel intentions; (b) the negative effect of structural constraint was negotiable, but the negative impacts of intrapersonal and interpersonal constraints were hard to negotiate; (c) the effects of subconstraints at the same level were heterogeneous, for example, the effects of cost constraint were insignificant, while those of time and transportation constraints were significant; (d) social support for travel had a negative moderating role on the relationship between habit constraint and negotiation but a positive moderating role on the relationship between interpersonal constraint and negotiation. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 83%

Section: The Mediation Of Constraint Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Senior's travel constraint, negotiation strategy and travel intention: Examining the role of social support

Chen

Dai

et al. 2020

Journal of Tourism Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It can be argued that the paucity of studies on the role of social sanctions in tourism has been corrected by scholarship on leisure constraints and negotiations to some extent. Studies on leisure constraints are driven by features such as income disparity and inequality and divergent socio-cultural values, both of which can impact peoples’ ability to participate in leisure activity or use leisure services (Chung et al, 2017; Jackson and Henderson, 1995). Such leisure constraints can be defined at three levels: intrapersonal, interpersonal and institutional (Anaza and McDowell, 2013; Crawford and Godbey, 1987; Crawford et al, 1991; Doran and Pomfret, 2019; Godbey et al, 2010; Kaas and Çerez, 2016; Shaw, 1994).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been identified that constraints can decrease the level of participation in leisure; however, it can also lead to leisure negotiation which can ultimately help increase the level of leisure participation (Hubbard and Mannell, 2001; Lyu et al, 2013; Son et al, 2008). The most usual leisure negotiation strategies include, amongst others, the acquisition of information and skill; alteration of leisure timing; adjusting to the costs of leisure participation; changing one’s attitudes or behaviour; or adopting family-related strategies (Chung et al, 2017). Though studies have looked into various leisure negotiation strategies, there is still a gap in literature in the context of non-European societies (Martin and Mason, 2004; Rojek et al, 2006; Stodolska and Livengood, 2006).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social sanctions of leisure and tourism constraints in Nepal

Bhandari

2020

Tourist Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study deals with the role of social sanctions in exploring the leisure-tourism engagement in Nepal. It then examines how people respond to societal norms and partake in leisure tourism vacations. The study applies the qualitative method and data is collected through in-depth interviews of purposely selected samples of 18 individuals in Kathmandu. The findings identify that the Nepali conception of leisure is subject to a degree of negative social sanctions, which people negotiate through their religious values and obligations. The paper establishes the centrality of social sanctions on leisure in understanding the incentives for tourism in a non-western society.

show abstract

“…Constraints are not necessarily barriers to leisure participation because people negotiate them [43][44][45][46] using various strategies [47,48]. Self-efficacy [49], social capital and motivation are factors affecting the negotiation and relative strategies [50].…”

Section: Constraints To Visiting a Museummentioning

confidence: 99%

How Physical Environment Impacts Visitors’ Behavior in Learning-Based Tourism—The Example of Technology Museum

Zhang

Chang²,

Tsai

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visiting a museum is a popular activity in the tourism industry, especially in cultural and learning-based tourism. To help plan museums effectively, this study investigated the underlying motivations and constraints and their impact on the perceived physical environment and visitor satisfaction toward a museum. The results suggest that the physical environment of museums serves as an axial mediator among motivations, constraints and visitor satisfaction. Six essential factors of physical environment are affected by motivations and constraints, further affecting visitor satisfaction in various patterns, in which architectural planning, exhibition, external environment, and entrance are clearly affected by basic motivations and constraints. Under motivations, family education and self-development are the most two profound influences on enhancing visitor satisfaction through the physical environment. Shops and café are worth special attention in meeting motivation of attractiveness, occasion and social interaction. The results could support the planning and design of a satisfactory museum.

show abstract

The role of perceived behavioural control in the constraint-negotiation process: the case of solo travel

Cited by 38 publications

References 46 publications

Senior's travel constraint, negotiation strategy and travel intention: Examining the role of social support

Senior's travel constraint, negotiation strategy and travel intention: Examining the role of social support

Social sanctions of leisure and tourism constraints in Nepal

How Physical Environment Impacts Visitors’ Behavior in Learning-Based Tourism—The Example of Technology Museum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About