The Role of Offsets in Malaysian Defence Industrialisation

Abstract

Defence offsets rank as one of the most important and controversial topics within the broad field of defence economics. Arms vendors are likely to view offsetting investment as a distraction, fearful of its potential to hurt the bottom line. By contrast, policymakers in the arms purchasing countries see offsets as an opportunity to extract technology transfer, as well as employment, investment and export sales opportunities. Establishing the actual impact of offsets, however, is not easy. The subject is shrouded in secrecy and myth, with anecdote and generalisation pervading even the intellectual press. This paper seeks to break the mould by offering an empirical case study of the role of offsets in Malaysian defence industrialisation.Defence offsets, Technology transfer, Defence industry, Malaysia,

The decline of South Africa’s defence industry

“…37 Similarly, Malaysia's procurements involving American, British, Russian, Italian, French, and Turkish offset programmes created just 100 local jobs. 38 Offset is also argued to be prone to corrupt practices. 39 Yet, it is unclear how serious the problem is once the distinction is made between actual versus potential corruption.…”

Developing Curricula for Signaling and Communication Course at Malaysian Railway Academy (MyRa) through Industrial Collaboration Program

“…However, rail operator's company in Malaysia received their training equipment under OFFSETS program from OEM main contractor that has won the government tender. Usually, the training equipment will be customized as per requirement in the contract [6].…”

The Complexities of Development: The South African National Industrial Participation Programme in Perspective

“…Industrial participation and countertrade have remained surprisingly resilient as methods of public procurement exercises and potential means of leveraging technology transfers and economic and industrial development. However, analyzing the impact of such programmes and deciphering their myths (Balakrishnan and Matthews 2009) are challenges to the relevant state agencies, industry practitioners and scholars alike. Andrea Hurst points out that development analysis and prescription should be grounded in a greater conceptual appreciation of the complexities and contradictions of social and economic reality (Hurst 2010).…”