2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of national culture on supply chain visibility: Lessons from Germany, Japan, and the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural differences may influence the approaches firms use to increase SCV. For example, Doetzer (2020) suggests that firms can improve SCV by matching their behaviors to those of the supply chain partners who differ in uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation. Wang et al (2020) similarly highlight the role of relational norms (behavioral expectations and standards) in driving information sharing by promoting goal congruence and socialization.…”
Section: Cognitive Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cultural differences may influence the approaches firms use to increase SCV. For example, Doetzer (2020) suggests that firms can improve SCV by matching their behaviors to those of the supply chain partners who differ in uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation. Wang et al (2020) similarly highlight the role of relational norms (behavioral expectations and standards) in driving information sharing by promoting goal congruence and socialization.…”
Section: Cognitive Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not address SCV types or contextual characteristics. Doetzer (2020) provide a focused review of 44 conceptual and empirical studies that address cultural characteristics that may affect SCV internationally. Kalaiarasan et al (2022) review 47 empirical articles that identify antecedents and effects of SCV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, SC vulnerability is often considered as the inverse of robustness, and therefore it is characterized by the degree to which a SC can be damaged from a disruption (Gu et al, 2021). Finally, SC visibility refers to the exchange and the sharing of information between the actors of the SC network, thus comprising an internal and external dimension, to enable stronger relationships between actors, and to push them to be more transparent and visible (Doetzer, 2020).…”
Section: Supply Chain Resilience: Elements and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characterization is similar to that of Prajogo and Olhager (2012), who state that information-sharing can support supply chains both operationally and strategically. Information-sharing is generally an essential competence in enhancing supply chain risk management (Doetzer, 2020), but it requires organizational preparation for sufficient utilization (Riley et al, 2016). Thus, to build resilience in post-disruptive phases, preparations for information-sharing need to take place in pre-disruptive phases.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Supply Chain Flexibility Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up questions in interviews allow the formation of "what-if" scenarios, which allow an understanding of the incentives behind information-sharing before and after the disruptions. In particular, semi-structured interviews offer the possibility to understand supply-chain-connected constructs by reshaping interview structures depending on the reallife examples discussed (Doetzer, 2020). A theory development approach is applied with deductive reasoning, because the questioning, as well as the data coding, are based on pre-existing constructs (phases and capabilities) drawn from the literature prior to data Role of information sharing for flexibility analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Supply Chain Flexibility Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%