1991
DOI: 10.1093/shm/4.2.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Medical Societies in the Rise of the Scottish Medical Profession 1730–1939

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Edinburgh Obstetrical Society, established in 1840 for example, ‘effectively remained for many years a society open to general practitioners’. 38 …”
Section: The Generalist Reaction 1858–1914mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Edinburgh Obstetrical Society, established in 1840 for example, ‘effectively remained for many years a society open to general practitioners’. 38 …”
Section: The Generalist Reaction 1858–1914mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of zoals Jacqueline Jenkinson het stelde in haar studie over de professionalisering van het medisch beroep in Schotland: 'Ultimately, the importance of medical societies lies in their close reflection of the trends within the professionalization process of medicine [...] over a considerable period of time'. 25 Openbare gezondheid: adviseren en lobbyen Parallel met de bloei van de historiografie over de medische professie ontstond echter kritiek op het professionaliseringsmodel. die kritiek kwam in de eerste plaats van binnenuit.…”
Section: Medicalisering: Groepscohesie En Deskundigheidunclassified
“…Historians have emphasised the impact of broader cultural values on medicine and the identity of its practitioners, 14 but less explored has been the role of these specialist medical clubs, which constituted a privileged space in the creation and maintenance of identity. 15 In founding the Society of Neurological Surgeons (SNS), a few surgeons made choices in including and excluding others, in sanctioning technical and moral values that dictated conduct, and in emphasising self-control in both the public sphere and the operating theatre. These choices reflected wider concerns of early twentieth-century medicine and laid the foundations for the moral economy of a new specialty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%