1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0032097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of lightness contrast in determining the magnitude of the Delboeuf illusion: A rejoinder to Weintraub and Cooper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the two-way interaction of 'The brief ex osure was used to diminish the influence of scanning, attention, and temporal integration on t i e illusion. See Sjostrom and Pollack 1972) for a more complete discussion of the methodology. Lightness x Circle Size was significant (F, ,, = 3.09, p = .O3, q i = .099).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the two-way interaction of 'The brief ex osure was used to diminish the influence of scanning, attention, and temporal integration on t i e illusion. See Sjostrom and Pollack 1972) for a more complete discussion of the methodology. Lightness x Circle Size was significant (F, ,, = 3.09, p = .O3, q i = .099).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halfway between was a small (2 xz mm) plus sign for fixation. The cards were presented in a white holder, with the subject's head placed in a headrest to hold eye-to-display distance at 1.80 m. These dimensions kept the total display, comparison, test, and inducing portions, within a horizontal visual angle of 3 ", Pollack has argued that this visual angle ought to be no greater than 3 0 (Sjostrom & Pollack, 1972). A vertical slot in a white cardboard mask obscured all but the fixation mark.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delboeuf illusion has been employed to alter the perceived size of a target. While the effect of lightness and contrast on the magnitude of the illusion has been considered in previous research (Oyama, 1962;Sjostrom & Pollack, 1972;Weintraub & Cooper, 1972), the reverse effect, i.e., the effect of perceived size on lightness, has received less attention. Brigner (1980), who examined the size and lightness interaction using a Delboeuf figure with grey disks, found that the grey disk that appeared smaller also looked "brighter."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%