1999
DOI: 10.1080/14628839950517039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of laser and intense light sources in photo-epilation: a comparative evaluation

Abstract: The method for laser and light assisted hair removal is based on the theory of selective photothermolysis. Selective absorption of hair chromophores from lasers and broad band light sources results in destruction of hair follicles while leaving the skin undamaged. A discussion of the basic principles of selective photothermolysis as it applies to hair removal by lasers and light sources is presented, followed by a comparative review of three melanin target based systems: Ruby laser, Alexandrite laser, and a br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Multiple treatments are necessary due to the nature of the hair growth cycle. 10 In IPL, by placing appropriate filters on the light source, wavelengths ranging from 590 to 1200 nm can be generated. Cut-off filters are used to eliminate short wavelengths, so that only the longer, more deeply penetrating wavelengths are emitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Multiple treatments are necessary due to the nature of the hair growth cycle. 10 In IPL, by placing appropriate filters on the light source, wavelengths ranging from 590 to 1200 nm can be generated. Cut-off filters are used to eliminate short wavelengths, so that only the longer, more deeply penetrating wavelengths are emitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1-cm 2 grid was used to count hairs at baseline and at various subsequent times (including 1, 2, 3, 4,6,8,9,12,14,16,18,20,24, and 30 months after IPL treatment for different patients) as previously described. 27 The data summarize the final clearance results observed at the last follow-up visit, accounting for different follow-up intervals after initial treatment (range, 12-30 months; mean±SD, 21.1±5.1 months).…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 This is achieved by setting the duration of the impulse above the calculated thermal relaxation time of the epidermis (3-10 milliseconds) and below the thermal relaxation time of the hair follicles (40-100 milliseconds). 9 Both selective photothermolysis and thermokinetic selectivity are hypothesized to mediate photoepilation via ruby, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] alexandrite, [17][18][19] diode, 20 and Qswitched Nd:YAG lasers, [21][22][23][24][25] as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) source [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] technologies. The present report documents the long-term efficacy and permanent results achieved with an IPL source for photoepilation (EpiLight; ESC Medical Systems, Norwood, Mass/Yokheam, Israel).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average hair clearance was 32.3% at week 12 (Figs. [1][2][3][4]. Although slight differences were seen, no significant difference in hair clearance was noted when broken down by skin type, hair color, or body location.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous methods available today for the removal of undesired hair; some offer only temporary hair removal, while others create more long-lasting or even permanent removal [1]. For the past decade now, lasers have been used to remove hair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%