The finding that only 57% of PAS-positive cases of tinea showed hyphal elements on H&E examination alone, together with no other differentiable histologic characteristics, lends strong support for the routine use of PAS-staining for inflammatory skin disorders.

No abstract

Background: With the increase in the use of soft-tissue fillers worldwide, there has been a rise in the serious adverse events such as vascular compromise and blindness. This article aims to review the role of fillers in causing blindness and the association between hyaluronic acid (HA) filler and blindness. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were used to report this review. Results: A total of 190 cases of blindness due to soft-tissue fillers were identified, of which 90 (47%) cases were attributed to autologous fat alone, and 53 (28%) cases were caused by HA. The rest of the cases were attributed to collagen, calcium hydroxylapatite, and other fillers. Conclusions: Autologous fat was the most common filler associated with blindness despite HA fillers being the most commonly used across the globe. However, the blindness caused by other soft-tissue fillers like collagen and calcium hydroxylapatite was represented. It was also evident through the review that the treatment of HA-related blindness was likely to have better outcomes compared with other fillers due to hyaluronidase use.

Treating superficial facial telangiectasia with a pulse stacking technique may improve clinical results without significantly increasing adverse effects.

With adequate training and instruction, patients may administer self-treatments for hair removal with this small light based unit in a safe and effective manner.

Background: Strict infection control measures in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic are expected to remain for an extended period. In aesthetic clinics, most procedures are provided on one to one basis by the physician or therapist. In such a scenario, guidelines detailing the infection control measures for aesthetic clinics are of particular importance.Methods: An online meeting of an international group of experts in the field of aesthetic medicine, with experience in administration of an aesthetic clinic, was convened. The meeting aimed to provide a set of consensus guidelines to protect clinic staff and patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results:Consensus guidelines for 'preferred practices' were provided for scheduling of patients, patient evaluation and triaging, and for safety precautions about the different procedures. Procedures were categorized into low-risk, moderate risk, and high-risk based on the likelihood of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus from the patient to the treating physician or therapist. Conclusions:While not intended to be complete or exhaustive, these guidelines provide sound infection control measures for aesthetic practices. Since guidelines regarding safety measures and use This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.of PPEs may vary from country to country, the local guidelines should also be followed to prevent Abstract:Background: Strict infection control measures in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic are expected to remain for an extended period. In aesthetic clinics, most procedures are provided on one to one basis by the physician or therapist. In such a scenario, guidelines detailing the infection control measures for aesthetic clinics are of particular importance.Methods: An online meeting of an international group of experts in the field of aesthetic medicine, with experience in administration of an aesthetic clinic, was convened. The meeting aimed to provide a set of consensus guidelines to protect clinic staff and patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results:Consensus guidelines for 'preferred practices' were provided for scheduling of patients, patient evaluation and triaging, and for safety precautions about the different procedures. Procedures This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.were categorized into low-risk, moderate risk, and high-risk based on the likelihood of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus from the patient to the treating physician or therapist. Conclusions:While not intended to be complete or exhaustive, these guidelines provide sound infection control measures for aesthetic practices. Since guidelines regarding safety measures and use of PPEs may vary from country to country, the local guidelines should also be followed to prevent COVID-19 infection in aesthetic clinics.

Elastophagocytosis was observed in 20% of LS cases, all of which were extragenital. We hypothesize that elastophagocytosis in LS, especially in extragenital sites, may not be an epiphenomenon but rather represents a contributing factor to elastic fiber loss in the hyalinized papillary dermal collagen that typifies this disease.

Background Minimally invasive and noninvasive facial aesthetic treatments are increasingly popular, and a greater understanding of patient perspectives on facial aesthetic priorities is needed. Objectives To provide data to aesthetic physicians that may be useful during patient consultations in increasing post-treatment satisfaction by surveying facial aesthetic concerns, desires, and treatment goals of aesthetically conscious men and women, and physicians, in 18 countries. Methods A global, internet-based survey on desired appearance and experiences with, or interest in, facial aesthetic treatments. Eligible survey respondents were aesthetically conscious adults (21-75 years). Eligible aesthetic physicians were required to see ≥30 patients/month for aesthetic reasons, have 2-30-years’ experience in clinical practice, and spend ≥70% of time in direct patient care. Results A total of 14,584 aesthetically conscious adults (mean age, 41 years; 70% women) and 1,315 aesthetic physicians (mean age, 45 years; 68% men) completed the survey. Most surveyed respondents (68%) reported that aesthetic procedures should be sought in their 30s-40s, while surveyed physicians recommended patients seek treatment earlier. Respondents expressed greatest concern over crow’s feet lines, forehead lines, facial skin issues, hair-related concerns, and under-eye bags or dark circles; in contrast, physicians tended to underestimate patient concerns about under-eye bags or dark circles, mid-face volume deficits, and skin quality. While both physicians and respondents cited cost as a major barrier to seeking aesthetic treatments, respondents also emphasized safety, fear of injections or procedure-related pain, and concern about unnatural-looking outcomes. Conclusions This large, global survey provides valuable insight into facial aesthetic concerns and perspectives of aesthetically conscious patients that may be implemented in patient education and consultations to improve patient satisfaction following aesthetic treatments.