1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70192-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
98
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, mini laparoscopy (ML) in conjunction with laparoscopic guided liver biopsy combines the visual inspection of the liver surface with histological evaluation of the liver, rendering it an attractive approach in ALF. The macroscopic appearance of liver parenchyma provides valuable additional information to histological examination alone, and ML appears equivalent to surgical laparoscopy for this purpose [13,14]. Additionally, ML has been deemed safe in multiple case series, among patients with or without coagulopathy [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, mini laparoscopy (ML) in conjunction with laparoscopic guided liver biopsy combines the visual inspection of the liver surface with histological evaluation of the liver, rendering it an attractive approach in ALF. The macroscopic appearance of liver parenchyma provides valuable additional information to histological examination alone, and ML appears equivalent to surgical laparoscopy for this purpose [13,14]. Additionally, ML has been deemed safe in multiple case series, among patients with or without coagulopathy [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological assessment of fibrosis is also an inherently subjective process and is subject to sampling variability. A study that compared laparoscopic versus histological diagnosis of cirrhosis found that 32% of cases were underdiagnosed with histological examination of a single liver biopsy specimen [17]. And a number of studies have demonstrated that excessive rates of sampling error (25-40%) result in poor reproducibility regardless of the underlying liver disease origin [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample error of liver biopsy has been described in 17-32% of cases in many previous examinations matching macro- and microscopic findings in chronic liver disease [5,13,14,15], including randomized trials that compared laparoscopy and mini-laparoscopy with percutaneous liver biopsy [6,16]. Histologic understaging of the liver disease seems to be more frequent in early (Child A) and macronodular cirrhosis [17] and is clearly dependent on the quality of the biopsy cylinder [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the fact that inflammatory activity and fibrosis in chronic liver disease are heterogeneously distributed throughout liver tissue, histologic evaluation alone may cause a relevant sample error [5,6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%