2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Language in Shaping International Migration

Abstract: This paper examines the importance of language in international migration from multiple angles by studying the role of linguistic proximity, widely spoken languages, linguistic enclaves and language-based immigration policy requirements. To this aim we collect a unique dataset on immigration flows and stocks in 30 OECD destinations from all world countries over the period 1980–2010, and construct a set of linguistic proximity measures. Migration rates increase with linguistic proximity and with English at dest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
219
2
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
219
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Studies of internal migration that use aggregate inter and intraregional population flows also emphasize the existence of budget constraints (Phan and Coxhead, 2010, for Vietnam;Golgher, 2012, 2 Most theories on bilateral migration movements emphasize "pull" and "push" factors with a particular focus on the potential increase in the value of individual human capital (Sjaastad, 1962). Nonetheless, recent empirical research also demonstrates the importance of noneconomic factors such as distance and cultural links (Belot and Hatton, 2008), language (Adsera and Pytlikova, 2012), and demographic forces and network effects (Mayda, 2010). 3 See also McKenzie and Rapoport's 2010 analysis of migration networks' role in migrant selection with respect to education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Studies of internal migration that use aggregate inter and intraregional population flows also emphasize the existence of budget constraints (Phan and Coxhead, 2010, for Vietnam;Golgher, 2012, 2 Most theories on bilateral migration movements emphasize "pull" and "push" factors with a particular focus on the potential increase in the value of individual human capital (Sjaastad, 1962). Nonetheless, recent empirical research also demonstrates the importance of noneconomic factors such as distance and cultural links (Belot and Hatton, 2008), language (Adsera and Pytlikova, 2012), and demographic forces and network effects (Mayda, 2010). 3 See also McKenzie and Rapoport's 2010 analysis of migration networks' role in migrant selection with respect to education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see this, refer again to the bottom of Table 3 which reports the residual variation in SB used for identification. This metric is cut in half as we move from column (2) to column (4), implying a correlation between language structure and the usual country-level proxies of gender roles 14 Alternatively, we checked the robustness of our results to measures of linguistic distance between languages from Adsera & Pytlikova (2015), including a Linguistic proximity index constructed using data from Ethnologue, and a Levenshtein distance measure developed by the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. This data covers 42 languages out of the 63 in our regression sample.…”
Section: Decomposing Language From Other Cultural Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This choice is grounded on the argument that linguistic distance serves as a good proxy for cultural distance (Guiso et al, 2009;Adsera and Pytlikova, 2012). Moreover, such an approach avoids the compli-cation arising with a nationality-based index weighting each nationality with some sort of "cultural" distance.…”
Section: Ethnic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%