The Role of Knowledge Management in the Innovation Process

Basadur, Min; Gelade, Garry A.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00368.x

Cited by 133 publications

(95 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…İlk aşama olan 'fikirlerin üretimi' aşaması, problemlerin fark edilmesi ve gerçek koşulların irdelenmesi sürecini içerir (Basadur ve Gelade, 2006). Yeni ürün ve hizmetlerin geliştirilmesi için yeni fikirlerin yaratılması aşamasıdır.…”

Section: I23unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Yaratici Endüstri̇lerde Yeni̇li̇kçi̇ İş Davranişi Ölçeği̇ni̇n Yöneti̇ci̇lere Uygulanmasi Ve Doğrulanmasi: Reklamcilik Sektörü Örneği̇

Kiroğlu¹,

Albayrak²

2017

Karadeniz

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZTopluma faydalı olacak ve ekonomik katkı sağlayacak yeni bir ürün veya hizmet yaratmak, inovasyon olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Alanyazında genel kabul gören haliyle inovasyon dört temel adımdan oluşan bir süreçtir: problemi/ fırsatları keşfetme, yeni fikirler üretme, fikirlerine destek arama, fikirlerini uygulamaya çevirme. Örgütsel veya bireysel boyutta başarılı bir inovasyon faaliyeti için inovasyon yapma eğilimi taşıyan bireye ihtiyaç vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Yenilikçi İş Davranışı Ölçeği ile boyutları belirlenen inovasyon sürecinin geçerliğinin ve güvenilirliğinin Türk Reklamcılık Sektörü özelinde doğrulanmasıdır. Kuramsal geçerlik ölçekte kullanılan her indikatöre yönelik yazından destek verilerek, güvenilirlik ise Reklamcılık sektöründen toplanan veri ikiye ayrılarak ardışık uygulanan Açıklayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri ile gerçekleştirilmiştir.Yenilikçi İş Davranışı Ölçeği soruları, yöneticilerin inovatif bireyi değerlendirmesine dayalıdır. Temel alınan çalışmadan farklı olarak inovatif davranışlar ve inovatif iş çıktılarının bir arada ölçülmesi modelin uygunluk oranını yükselttiği bulgulanmıştır.Anahtar Kelimeler: Yenilikçi İş Davranışı, inovasyon, açıklayıcı faktör analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ABSTRACT Development or creation of a new product or a service that makes an economic contribution or utility for the society is called as innovation. For the majority of the literature innovation is a process that consists of four bases: exposure of problems/opportunities, generation of ideas, searching for support for the ideas, and putting ideas into practice. For a successful innovation activity either in organizational or individual scope an individual that has a tendency to innovate is essential. The aim of this * Öğretim

show abstract

Section: I23unclassified

“…'Optimizasyon ' adı verilen bu aşamada görev alanlar, soyut fikirleri zihinsel olarak test ederek optimal çözüme ulaşmaya çalışırlar (Basadur ve Gelade, 2006 …”

Section: I23unclassified

Yaratici Endüstri̇lerde Yeni̇li̇kçi̇ İş Davranişi Ölçeği̇ni̇n Yöneti̇ci̇lere Uygulanmasi Ve Doğrulanmasi: Reklamcilik Sektörü Örneği̇

Kiroğlu¹,

Albayrak²

2017

Karadeniz

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…OL is found to resonate and develop in a dynamic process where knowledge moves along the different levels of action, going from an individual to a group level, and then to the organisational level and back again [54] [42]. This relationship between KM and OL is therefore believed to be as the hook adopting new habits and beliefs that would facilitate the transition from a reactive attitude, characterized by a slow adaptation to change, to a proactive attitude that anticipates modifications [39] [55].…”

Section: Km Influence On Organisational Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Even though literature does not clearly distinguish between KM and OL, OL is argued as the process to facilitate knowledge sharing and establishes continuous learning process within an organisation [38]. Therefore Basadur and Gelade [39] argued that the current concepts of KM and OL can improve organisational effectiveness through grasping opportunities that lead to better enhancement of human capital, innovation, social and organisational capital [12] [40] [41]. The cyclical development of OL caused by KM gives strength for the strategic role of the KM holistic and comprehensive model [42].…”

Section: Km Influence On Organisational Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Knowledge Management on Learning in Government Organisations

Buheji¹,

Al-Hasan²,

Thomas³

et al. 2014

AJIBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a tendency for government organizations to become competitive due to instability in modern economies. Accordingly, Knowledge Management (KM) has been rapidly growing in the past decade as a source of influence on organisational development practices. In the past decade research approaches largely failed to show the importance of KM initiatives in creating synergy with other initiatives to an extent that would lead towards organizational competitiveness. This paper investigates whether KM holistically influences organisational learning, specifically in the context of the government sector. In order to understand the relationships between KM and organisational learning identified in the literature and increasingly used in practice, a quantitative survey approach was undertaken using a series of researcher-developed scales. Based on the literature review Organisational Learning (OL) was identified to be important in relation to KM, and a conceptual framework was designed to test the concept of the holistic influence of KM on organisational learning. Some 625 valid responses were collected from top and middle management from 54 government organizations in the Kingdom of Bahrain, and the model was statistically tested according to the research hypotheses by regression analysis then Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The results reveal strong and significant correlations amongst organisational development practices. Even though the holistic influence of the model could not be confirmed, findings show positive KM influence on organisational development practices, thus KM is an essential factor for government organisations. As well as illustrating KM as an important source of influence, this study establishes a new direction that helps to integrate all governmental organisations' initiatives in relevance to organisation development practice leading to better competitiveness. The research makes a novel contribution since it increases the probability of a holistic approach model that brings support for decision makers to enhance overall government organizations' competitiveness. The scale developed for the model tested can be generalised and used as a self assessment tool for organisational practices in KM. The work sets a baseline for KM practices in M. Buheji et al. 658the Government of Bahrain and similar GCC Governments that can act as a reference for researchers on KM, learning and competitiveness in emerging economies. The model needs further investigation in future research to explore the missing variables to make it "fit for purpose". This concept of a holistic model needs to be further subjected to empirical investigation to explore its viability. The major limitation of this research is because it has addressed only the government sector in one country.

show abstract

“…Innovation is the conception of innovative significance. Innovation is the procedure which converts innovative thoughts into novel significance [3]. One can"t be able to innovate lacking of originality.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%