2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of influent organic carbon-to-nitrogen (COD/N) ratio in removal rates and shaping microbial ecology in soil aquifer treatment (SAT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that the typical low biodegradability of the organic carbon at the secondary effluent, which was also reflected in the low removal rate of the COD, BOD, and UVA254, mentioned earlier (Section 3.4, Figure A5a,b in the Appendix A) was a key parameter on the rates of heterotrophic activity [44].…”
Section: Denitrificationsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that the typical low biodegradability of the organic carbon at the secondary effluent, which was also reflected in the low removal rate of the COD, BOD, and UVA254, mentioned earlier (Section 3.4, Figure A5a,b in the Appendix A) was a key parameter on the rates of heterotrophic activity [44].…”
Section: Denitrificationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…With addition of H 2 O 2 , the ∆DOC, ∆UVA 254 and ∆COD increased to 2.3 ± 0.7 mg/L, 44 ± 7 1/m and 14.6 ± 4 mg/L, respectively, indicating additional organic carbon utilization by bacteria (Appendix A Figure A5: concentrations and the removal of DOC and UVA 254 over sampling campaigns before the biofilter and after the biofilter). The oxygen utilization, in favor of nitrification rather than carbon oxidation, reflects the low biodegradability of organic matter, which is typical for effluent post-secondary treatment with flocculation-filtration removal [41][42][43][44]. This is also supported by no removal of most trace organic compounds in the biofilter, besides Acesulfame and Iopromide that were removed by 60% and 30%, respectively [34].…”
Section: Organic Carbon Removal With H 2 O 2 Additionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nitrolancea -like 16S rRNA gene sequences have only rarely been detected in specialized incubations of water or soil samples ( Sorokin et al, 2018 ). These include soil columns used for aquifer treatment ( Friedman et al, 2018 ), 1,3-dichloropropene fumigated soil ( Fang et al, 2019 ), and manure composting ( Zhang et al, 2016 ). A closely related 16S rRNA gene sequence (JN087902) has been detected in a SHARON (single reactor system for high activity ammonium removal over nitrite) reactor in Korea running at elevated temperature, a system with conditions comparable to the source of Nl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the effluent nutrient indices (Figure 4(b)), proportional TAN removal was positively related to nitrate concentration, because TAN was mainly oxidized to nitrate. TAN removal was also negatively related to effluent TCOD and DCOD because the excess effluent organic content inhibited nitrifier activity (Friedman et al 2018). The obvious positive correlation between TN/TIN removal and nitrite suggested that the ammonium removal path in the reactors might include short-cut nitrification and denitrification (Jiang et al 2020).…”
Section: Rda Analysis Between Performance and Effluent Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%