2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Forest-Related Income in Household Economies and Rural Livelihoods in the Border-Region of Southern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
51
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(34 reference statements)
13
51
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ummrawaba and Elnehud, the relative dependence on gum arabic income shows a general increasing trend with the total income (Figure 4a,b). These results contradict recent studies that disclosed the higher relative dependence of the poor on forest and environmental incomes [48,50]. However, it reflects the commercial value of the products with higher income opportunity for the poor and better-off households.…”
Section: Absolute and Relative Gum And Resin Income Across Income Quacontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ummrawaba and Elnehud, the relative dependence on gum arabic income shows a general increasing trend with the total income (Figure 4a,b). These results contradict recent studies that disclosed the higher relative dependence of the poor on forest and environmental incomes [48,50]. However, it reflects the commercial value of the products with higher income opportunity for the poor and better-off households.…”
Section: Absolute and Relative Gum And Resin Income Across Income Quacontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies highlighted the influence of different socioeconomic factors on households' NTFP income [50,51,54,58]. However, these influences are variable and site specific, and cannot be generalized to all NTFPs, or to all socioeconomic and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the study are similar with those Hegde (2013), Hogarth et al, (2013) and Kumar (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Contribution of selling NFTPs to household budget in target area was lower, 4.02% in buffer-zone area and 22.34% in central area, respectively, if we compare them with 39% reported from northern Benin (Heubach et al, 2011), 27% from Tigray, northern Ethiopia (Babulo et al, 2008), 19-32% from eastern India (Saha and Sundriyal, 2012), 31.5% from southern China (Hogarth et al, 2013). Our values rather correspond with 15% observed in Malawi (Kamanga et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%