The Role of Dysphoria in Social Thinking and Behaviour

Abstract

In response to Palermo (2016, Australian Psychologist, in press) comments, some aspects of the target paper are further elaborated here. In particular, given Palermo's timely emphasis on the potential social and cultural implications of research demonstrating the beneficial consequences of negative affect, the historical background, and practical implications of the experimental evidence are elaborated. Furthermore, the reviewer also comments on the applicability of alternative theoretical conceptualizations to the data reported here, and this issue also receives further attention. Overall, it is concluded that there is now strong and convergent evidence for the often beneficial consequences of mild negative affect, and these findings deserve serious consideration in practical applications of psychology, and in our conceptions of what represents a healthy and balanced emotional life. Embracing and accepting periods of negative affectivity should be recognised as a normal and healthy part of the human condition, and the cultural bias towards positive affect should be tempered by an appreciation of the adaptive benefits of dysphoria.

The hierarchically mechanistic mind: an evolutionary systems theory of the human brain, cognition, and behavior

“…Finally, research across the subdisciplines has furnished convincing evidence that the precipitants and correlates of depression directly relate to adverse social contexts (Gotlib & Hammen, 2014; Joiner & Coyne, 1999). Consistent with the social risk hypothesis, depressed mood is associated with improved social problem-solving (Forgas, 2017) and an increase in the accuracy of social inferences (e.g., depressive realism; Moore & Fresco, 2012), along with a specific attentional bias towards socially threatening stimuli (Allen et al, 2001; Mathews, Ridgeway, & Williamson, 1996). Moreover, behavioral correlates of depression, such as social withdrawal and reassurance-seeking, reflect explicit attempts to elicit support and defuse potential conflict (Hagen, 2011; Sloman & Gilbert, 2000).…”

A Pragmatic Analysis of Requests in Irish English and Russian

“…Secondly, a balance of directness and indirectness is required to maximise the chance of hearer compliance while avoiding causing offence. Finding this balance can cause psychological conflict for the speaker (Forgas, 2001).…”

A Ciência explica a Felicidade?

“…Pessoas felizes são mais a vontade com os outros, mais benevolentes. Vivem sem se concentrar nos perigos e armadilhas sociais do mundo que nos rodeia (FORGAS, 2001).. Pessoas satisfeitas são menos atentas aos detalhes, o que as fazem presas fáceis a mentiras e golpes.…”