2005
DOI: 10.1300/j037v14n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Domestic Animosity in Consumer Choice: Empirical Evidence from Germany

Abstract: The paper argues that specific choice and preference constructs previously only applied in international research may explain certain domestic phenomena better than those concepts typically used in domestic choice and preference studies. The animosity model of foreign product purchase is employed within the German consumer market. Results suggest that the previously uninvestigated notion of domestic animosity is responsible for a recent cross-segmental preference reversal in the eastern part of the nation. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, five studies in this group (Shimp et al, 2004;Hinck, 2004;Hinck et al, 2004;Cicic et al, 2005;Shoham et al, 2006) apply the construct to domestic settings where hostilities between regions are present within national borders. Introducing two different terms - Hinck (2004) using "domestic animosity" and Shimp et al (2004) using "regional animosity" -the underlying idea of examining consequences of inter-border tensions on buying behaviour via the animosity construct is identical. Similarly, Cicic et al (2005) investigate inter-ethnic animosities among national groups in Bosnia-Herzegovina, while Shoham et al (2006) Klein et al (1998) General animosity (1 item):…”
Section: Study Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, five studies in this group (Shimp et al, 2004;Hinck, 2004;Hinck et al, 2004;Cicic et al, 2005;Shoham et al, 2006) apply the construct to domestic settings where hostilities between regions are present within national borders. Introducing two different terms - Hinck (2004) using "domestic animosity" and Shimp et al (2004) using "regional animosity" -the underlying idea of examining consequences of inter-border tensions on buying behaviour via the animosity construct is identical. Similarly, Cicic et al (2005) investigate inter-ethnic animosities among national groups in Bosnia-Herzegovina, while Shoham et al (2006) Klein et al (1998) General animosity (1 item):…”
Section: Study Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hinck, 2004;Klein et al, 1998;Witkowski, 2000). Through the crisis and post-crisis period, the rating of this item dropped and then went back up again (from 5.07 to 4.05, and then 5.64; p , 0:05 for all changes).…”
Section: Response (Re): Proud To Own Willing To Buymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated that consumer animosity can directly influence consumers' willingness to buy (Witkowski, 2000;Hinck, 2005;Shoham et al, 2006;Ishii, 2009), or willingness to boycott (Nijssen and Douglas, 2004;Smith and Li, 2010). Some studies of consumer animosity have examined changes in animosity over time and discriminated between stable animosity and situational animosity (Jung et al, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%