2011
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjq005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Trade Agreements*

Abstract: Although disputes are typically treated as synonymous with concerns about enforcement in economic models of trade agreements, in reality most WTO disputes seem to concern the interpretation of vague provisions, or instances where the agreement is silent. And some have suggested that the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) could usefully grant exceptions to rigid contractual obligations. These activist DSB roles could help "complete" an incomplete contract. But how activist should the DSB be? Should DSB rulings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such dispute costs have played a significant role in prior theory of the WTO dispute settlement process. Maggi and Staiger (2011) argue that a dispute cost is important for explaining a pro-trade bias in WTO rulings.…”
Section: Payoffsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dispute costs have played a significant role in prior theory of the WTO dispute settlement process. Maggi and Staiger (2011) argue that a dispute cost is important for explaining a pro-trade bias in WTO rulings.…”
Section: Payoffsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly describe here research that adopts this perspective. Maggi and Staiger (2011) provide a first analysis of roles that dispute settlement might play in a trade agreement modeled as an incomplete contract. Trade takes place between two countries in a single industry.…”
Section: Contract Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-period extended model is also considered to explore implications of allowing the court to establish precedent. Maggi and Staiger (2011) derive a number of results assessing different degrees of court activism. First, it is never optimal to allow the court to modify obligations that are clearly stated in the contract.…”
Section: Contract Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case study of the 1966 ruling of the International Court of Justice in the South West Africa case, Johns shows how a surprise ruling could both undermine the regime and destabilize relations in the region. The efficiency of dispute settlement as a means for actors to complete an incomplete contract by clarifying interpretation or filling gaps depends on the accuracy of the court (Maggi and Staiger 2011). These theories highlight the importance of assessing whether courts play the role of objective arbiter of the law.…”
Section: A Critical Look At the Role Of Legalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%