1996
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
1
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
116
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, authors such as Forsman and Annala (2011) and Levinthal and March (1993) state that incremental innovation performance is more common in small firms. Dewar and Dutton (1986) and Germain (1996) find that although size has a positive effect on radical process innovation performance, this effect is non-significant on incremental process innovation performance.…”
Section: Size and Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, authors such as Forsman and Annala (2011) and Levinthal and March (1993) state that incremental innovation performance is more common in small firms. Dewar and Dutton (1986) and Germain (1996) find that although size has a positive effect on radical process innovation performance, this effect is non-significant on incremental process innovation performance.…”
Section: Size and Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 In studying logistics innovation adoption, Germain found that organizational size and environmental uncertainty predict expensive, radical innovations but not incremental innovation. 38 Damanpour reported that the effect of environmental uncertainty is significant for the size-innovation relationship and helps explain variance beyond control variables. 39 In a related study, 40 he also indicated that the relationship between bureaucratic control and innovation is less negative under conditions of high environmental uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further suggestions for these subdimensions are presented by Aiken and Hage (1971) and include decentralization, formalization, professionalism, complexity and scheduled and unscheduled communication. In an investigation into the role played by organizational structure in innovation in logistics, Germain (1996) too includes specialization and decentralization; and makes the addition of 'integration' to the list of subcategories. An investigation on the topic of organizational structure and its link to product customization by Vickery et al (1999) utilized the subdimensions of operations decentralization, focus on formal control, spans of control and layers.…”
Section: Organizational Structurementioning
confidence: 99%