The Role of Consolidation in Memory

Geller, Anne; Jarvik, Murray E.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9048-0_10

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the earlier studies, mainly those published prior to 1940 (A. C. Anderson, 1940;Magdsick, 1936), have been criticized because of methodological deficiencies. In addition, the authors used different terms to describe the same phenomenon observed after positively and negatively reinforced task: "reminiscence" (Bovet, Bovet-Nitti, & Oliverio, 1969;Jaffard, Destrade, Soumireu-Mourat, & Cardo, 1974), "incubation" (Geller & Jarvik, 1970;Pinel & Cooper, 1966), or simply "improvement of performance" (Gisquet-Verrier & Alexinsky, 1986;Stanes, Brown, & Singer, 1976). For these reasons, the existence of this fluctuation of retention performance as a real feature of memory processes has been largely ignored.…”

Section: Time-dependent Fluctuations Of Retention Performance In An Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Time-dependent fluctuations of retention performance in an aversively motivated task

Gisquet-Verrier¹,

Alexinsky²

1988

Animal Learning & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main aim of this series of experiments was to clearly establish the spontaneous development of retention performance following partial aversively motivated training. Experiment 1 indicated that following 15 training trials of a brightness discrimination in a V-maze, performance spontaneously and transitorily deteriorated 1 h following inital training (Kamin effect) before it improved 8 to 14 days following training (long-term spontaneous improvement). Both of these fluctuations preceded the more durable deterioration that corresponds to long-term forgetting. Experiment 2 replicated the basic findings of the first experiment, always with a brightness discrimination, but using an avoidance paradigm. These results demonstrated the multiphasic nature of the retention curve and emphasized the reliability of retention performance fluctuations.

show abstract

Section: Time-dependent Fluctuations Of Retention Performance In An Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Time-dependent fluctuations of retention performance in an aversively motivated task

Gisquet-Verrier¹,

Alexinsky²

1988

Animal Learning & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nonmonotonic Changes in the Context Shift Effect Over Time

Land

Riccio

1998

Learning and Motivation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cycloheximide induced amnesia: Its interaction with detention

Geller

Robustelli

Jarvik

1971

Psychopharmacologia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. After training in a passive avoidance task, mice were detained in the safe compartment of the conditioning apparatus: This detention produced an impairment of rentention on the retest trial.Detention did not prolong the cycloheximide susceptible phase of memory formation. A summation of the amnestic effects of the two treatments occurred only at a time when both were effective alone. Cycloheximide was without effect upon the detention experience itself.

show abstract

The Role of Consolidation in Memory

Cited by 9 publications

References 42 publications

Time-dependent fluctuations of retention performance in an aversively motivated task

Time-dependent fluctuations of retention performance in an aversively motivated task

Nonmonotonic Changes in the Context Shift Effect Over Time

Cycloheximide induced amnesia: Its interaction with detention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About