1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050339.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks' gestation in stratifying antenatal care

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine the value of one-stop color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at the time of the 20-week anomaly scan, to select women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).Patients and methods A total of 1022 unselected women had color Doppler imaging of both uterine arteries at the time of their dating/anomaly scan (19-21 weeks' gestation). The presence or absence of notching of the flow velocity waveform (FVW) was noted, and the resistance index (RI) was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
4
10

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
75
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 100 pregnant women in the study group, 54 (54%) were primigravida and 27 (27%) were gravida 2, which was similar to that quoted by Kurdi et al, 14 Martin et al, 15 and Papageorghiou et al 16 Out of 100 women in the study group, 41% women developed IUGR along with PIH and this was comparable to the study of Coleman et al 17 eclampsia is due to demographic variation of study population characteristics and their geographical variation as rural population have nutritional deficiency (above studies involved urban population) and due to biphasic screening method of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Of the 100 pregnant women in the study group, 54 (54%) were primigravida and 27 (27%) were gravida 2, which was similar to that quoted by Kurdi et al, 14 Martin et al, 15 and Papageorghiou et al 16 Out of 100 women in the study group, 41% women developed IUGR along with PIH and this was comparable to the study of Coleman et al 17 eclampsia is due to demographic variation of study population characteristics and their geographical variation as rural population have nutritional deficiency (above studies involved urban population) and due to biphasic screening method of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Of the many risk markers for preeclampsia (Table 5) [99,111,, many are known at booking and increase the risk of preeclampsia two-to fourfold [165]. The strongest of these are previous preeclampsia, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, pre-existing medical conditions, and multiple pregnancy (all bolded in Table 5).…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xtensive research over the past 20 years has evaluated the use of uterine artery Doppler evaluation in the second [1][2][3][4][5][6] trimesters of pregnancy as a screening tool to predict the later development of preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction (FGR), placental abruption, and stillbirth. Since the introduction of uterine artery Doppler as an early screening test for complications in pregnancy in the mid-1980s, conflicting results on its value have been reported as discussed by Papageorghiou et al 4 The persistence of bilateral notches in uterine arteries associated with a quantitative resistance index cutoff at 24 weeks' gestation was reported to improve screening efficacy to identify patients at risk for complications in pregnancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%