1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01969388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of capital flows in the adjustment of money demand: The case of Finland

Abstract: The paper models the dual role of money balances as a short-run buffet stock and an asset with a weU-speeified long-run demand function. The analysis is carried out in an open economy framework. Consequently, there will be an offset to monetary policy in the form of induced capital movements, but in our model, it will be distributed over time even under perfect substitutability of financial claims. Estimates for the parameters of the demand for money function axe obtained from a capital flow equation using bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is space here only to mention some representative studies. As far as the demand for money function per se is concerned, the issues which I have raised in this paper have been investigated for the United States by, among others, Lewis (1978), Laidler (1980), Coats (1982) and Judd and Scadding (1982b), for the United Kingdom by Artis and Lewis (1976) and for Finland by Kanniainen and Tarkka (1983 stock approach gets support from this work, particularly the more recent studies.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is space here only to mention some representative studies. As far as the demand for money function per se is concerned, the issues which I have raised in this paper have been investigated for the United States by, among others, Lewis (1978), Laidler (1980), Coats (1982) and Judd and Scadding (1982b), for the United Kingdom by Artis and Lewis (1976) and for Finland by Kanniainen and Tarkka (1983 stock approach gets support from this work, particularly the more recent studies.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Consequently, viewing the price level as being determined in the money market does not 'work well' empirically. Similar models to which this criticism attaches include Khan (1986), Coats (1982) and Kanniainen and Tarrka (1984). Artis and Lewis (1976) and Lewis ( Note that coefficient restrictions apply.…”
Section: Milbournementioning
confidence: 99%