1990
DOI: 10.3386/w3435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Banks in Reducing the Costs of Financial Distress in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
118
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We do find differences in this respect, however, between firms from Japan and from economies outside Japan. In Japan, agency issues appear less important in affecting the benefits and costs of group affiliation and much of the gains from group affiliation accrue for financially constrained firms, consistent with Hoshi et al (1990Hoshi et al ( , 1991. The differences in results between Japan and the rest of Asia are consistent with Khanna and Yafeh (2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do find differences in this respect, however, between firms from Japan and from economies outside Japan. In Japan, agency issues appear less important in affecting the benefits and costs of group affiliation and much of the gains from group affiliation accrue for financially constrained firms, consistent with Hoshi et al (1990Hoshi et al ( , 1991. The differences in results between Japan and the rest of Asia are consistent with Khanna and Yafeh (2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The value of group affiliation to relieve financial constraints and to overcome costly financial distress is shown in case of Japan. Hoshi, Kayshap and Scharfstein (1990) find that Japanese firms in industrial groups, with close financial relationships to their banks and suppliers, invest more and sell more after the onset of distress than non-group firms do. Hoshi, Kayshap and Scharfstein (1991) analyze the role of group affiliation in Japan and find that firms with group affiliation with large Japanese banks benefit from reduced information and incentive problems as investment is less sensitive to liquidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The empirical literature has not reached a robust conclusion on this issue. According to Hoshi et al (1990), in Japan firms whose debt is concentrated with a single bank, within a group of firms or keyretsu, have better access to credit in periods of distress. On the contrary, in the case of the US, Houston and James (2001) find that cash-flow sensitivity is larger at firms with an exclusive banking relationship.…”
Section: Firms' Financial Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our hypothesis is motivated by the idea that banks can reduce the cost of lending by developing mutually beneficial relationships with firms through the accumulation of proprietary information about firms that is not easily transferable (e.g., Diamond (1984), (1991), Rajan (1994), (1995)). Although strong relationships with firms can allow banks to have longer horizons and insulate firms from short-term adverse conditions (Hoshi, Kashyap, and Scharfstein (1990)), distressed banks might not have resources to do so. Additionally, distressed banks might have incentives to act opportunistically and exploit their informational advantage over other suppliers of capital (Sharpe (1990), Rajan (1992), and Boot, Greenbaum, and Thakor (1993)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%