2023
DOI: 10.1017/cft.2023.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of art in coastal and marine sustainability

Abstract: Sustainability is a universal goal that requires balancing social, economic and environmental dimensions, and that applies to both terrestrial and marine environments. Several authors argue that arts are valuable tools to frame and engage with current environmental issues related to sustainability, including pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Accordingly, our research question is: what is the role of art in the sustainability of coasts and seas? We searched our research question on the two most … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I also excluded articles which although had elements of art, ocean, scientists or public engagement, were not collaborations directly between a scientist(s) and artist(s) (column titled Related Articles in Table 1). I thus excluded articles from projects which use creative methods but did not mention any artscience collaboration directly (see Gebbels et al, 2012;Neilson et al, 2016), reflections on historical ocean art (Berta, 2021), ocean art reviews which focus on general ocean art rather than specifically on art-science collaborations (Radstone, 2017;Helmreich and Jones, 2018;Matias et al, 2023), articles which analyse art projects but the researchers who wrote the article were not involved with the project ( Van der Vaart et al, 2018), individual reflections by ocean artists which do not mention any scientifc collaboration (Nobel, 2015) and those projects that have yet to happen (see Parsons et al, 2021). In addition to these papers, others were read either from reviewing the bibliographies of those papers discovered through the web of science review, prior knowledge of research papers and books, as well as also what was recommended by colleagues and others in the field.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I also excluded articles which although had elements of art, ocean, scientists or public engagement, were not collaborations directly between a scientist(s) and artist(s) (column titled Related Articles in Table 1). I thus excluded articles from projects which use creative methods but did not mention any artscience collaboration directly (see Gebbels et al, 2012;Neilson et al, 2016), reflections on historical ocean art (Berta, 2021), ocean art reviews which focus on general ocean art rather than specifically on art-science collaborations (Radstone, 2017;Helmreich and Jones, 2018;Matias et al, 2023), articles which analyse art projects but the researchers who wrote the article were not involved with the project ( Van der Vaart et al, 2018), individual reflections by ocean artists which do not mention any scientifc collaboration (Nobel, 2015) and those projects that have yet to happen (see Parsons et al, 2021). In addition to these papers, others were read either from reviewing the bibliographies of those papers discovered through the web of science review, prior knowledge of research papers and books, as well as also what was recommended by colleagues and others in the field.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such way that thinking under, through and with the oceans is being advanced in novel ways, is through the combination of the artistic and scientific worlds. Art has become an important tool in understanding coastal and marine sustainability (Matias et al, 2023) and so the coming together of artists and marine scientists has seen a rise in the past few decades, and with it, so has the number of academic articles and books published on the subject (Probyn et al, 2020;Jung et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%