1992
DOI: 10.1097/00006565-199212000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of abdominal x-rays in the diagnosis and management of intussusception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26,38,40 In the present study, a highly suggestive abdominal radiograph was found to be an important independent predictor. Intussusception, however, also occurred in 21% of patients without highly suggestive radiographs, similar to what has been reported previously.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,26,38,40 In the present study, a highly suggestive abdominal radiograph was found to be an important independent predictor. Intussusception, however, also occurred in 21% of patients without highly suggestive radiographs, similar to what has been reported previously.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, the interpretation of an abdominal radiograph may vary depending on the experience of the physician reviewing the radiograph, the level of comfort with pediatric radiology, and the quality and technique of the radiograph. 2,24,26,36,39,40 In a recent prospective study of clinical predictors of intussusception, the authors identified right upper quadrant abdominal mass, rectal bleeding and the triad of intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting, and right upper quadrant abdominal mass as significantly predictive of intussusception. 13 Negative predictors were also identified, but none with sufficient accuracy to obviate evaluation with ultrasound or air or contrast enema.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult intussusceptions are detected using plain abdominal film, barium studies, colonoscopy, abdominal sonography, abdominal CT, angiography and magnetic resonance imaging[11,13,14]. Although there are several diagnostic imaging techniques, as mentioned above, an abdominal CT scan is the most commonly used and accurate diagnostic modality[9,13-15]. CT shows “target” or “sausage”-shaped lesions, while also defining the location, nature and relationship of the lesion to surrounding tissues with an accuracy that ranges from 60% to 100%[3,9,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several diagnostic imaging techniques, as mentioned above, an abdominal CT scan is the most commonly used and accurate diagnostic modality[9,13-15]. CT shows “target” or “sausage”-shaped lesions, while also defining the location, nature and relationship of the lesion to surrounding tissues with an accuracy that ranges from 60% to 100%[3,9,13,15]. Abdominal ultrasonography has also been successful in diagnosing intussusception, especially if a palpable mass is found[16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For intussusception, however, the use of plain radiographs remains controversial [149,150], because the diagnostic accuracy is about 25% to 50% [147,151,152]. Nevertheless, the following radiographic findings have become almost pathognomonic for intussusception:…”
Section: Laboratory and Diagnostic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%