2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44914-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of a Political Party Website: Lessons Learnt from the User Perspective

Abstract: Part 2: Review and AnalysisInternational audienceThough substantial research efforts have been spent on understanding the role of political party websites, there is a lack of in-depth knowledge concerning how such webpages are experienced by their users. In this paper, we present an interview study addressing users’ experiences of political party websites. Eleven users of a political party website were interviewed to explore their experiences with this website in terms of its features for information, engageme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order for citizens to engage in political debate online, there must be an engaging topic, a certain will to contribute, frustration with a situation and reciprocal learning (Følstad and Lüders 2013). Party websites must offer high-quality information and a space for user interactions in which differing views are tolerated (Følstad et al 2014). Følstad et al prioritised informational content above website engagement features for regular users of the website, advising that the information should be complementary to other online content, locally specified and possessing marked perspectives or opinions.…”
Section: Effects On Political Opinion and Behaviour: Inconclusive Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for citizens to engage in political debate online, there must be an engaging topic, a certain will to contribute, frustration with a situation and reciprocal learning (Følstad and Lüders 2013). Party websites must offer high-quality information and a space for user interactions in which differing views are tolerated (Følstad et al 2014). Følstad et al prioritised informational content above website engagement features for regular users of the website, advising that the information should be complementary to other online content, locally specified and possessing marked perspectives or opinions.…”
Section: Effects On Political Opinion and Behaviour: Inconclusive Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, research in the field of online political debate shows that the forms through which civic engagement are expressed may strongly depend on the design of online engagement platforms (Stromer-Galley & Wichowski, 2011). For example, the usefulness of nurturing opposing voices within a discussion space, as well as connecting between different discussion spaces has been highlighted (Følstad, Johannessen, & Lüders, 2014). Ward (2011) pointed out that online solutions for civic engagement need to be conceived as a direct link of interactive communication between the organisation and the citizen, where the citizen is provided a means for responding to the organisation.…”
Section: Designing For Youth Civic Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinger () also suggests that nonprofits optimize their email subject lines to improve users' open rates; subject lines should be personal, forthright, short, and action‐oriented. Folstad, Johannesen, and Luders () note the importance of using email to notify subscribers when new information is posted onto an organization's website and thus keep the engagement going. Social media strategies . Social media are best associated with the long‐term‐shallow group of stakeholders because research has not established that consumption of nonprofits' social media messages leads to deep engagement by visitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When implemented carefully, social media can establish lines of communication between organizations and their stakeholders, as well as lines of communication between and within stakeholder groups (Grunig & Huang, ; Ihm, ). Still, depending on the type of organization and the issues raised on social media platforms, some interested parties may actively shy away from interacting or discussing on a nonprofit's Facebook page because they do not wish to have a permanent record of their views on the internet or may be afraid of potential harassment due to their views (Folstad et al, ). Social enterprise . Social enterprise is a way for nonprofits to raise revenue from the sale of products that are associated with the nonprofit's mission and vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%