The role, formation mechanism, and dynamic mechanism of action of technology standards in industrial systems

Jiang, Hong; Zhao, Shukuan; Liu, Chang; Chen, Yong

doi:10.1007/s10799-015-0230-8

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case of companies, they tend to focus on standards and standardization processes that are closely related to their core business [53]- [55]. The core value of standards is to set technical specifications, such as quality, performance, and safety requirements, that products should fulfill in order to enter the market; therefore, technology standards compliance is necessary for companies to be able to compete in the market [1], [13], [14], [56], [57].…”

Section: A Companies (Company-level)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Like core companies, following companies also sponsor standard alliances; however, the intention of their action is different from that of core companies. In comparison with core companies, following companies sponsor standard alliances to address deficiencies, such as a lack of knowledge and lack of resources for standardization, as participating in alliances provides opportunities to access external knowledge and resources [51], [53]- [55], [75], [85], [88], [117], [130]. They monitor technology strategies to attain technological guidance for their business and to explore strategic opportunities [89], [129].…”

Section: B Concept Maps Of Primary Actors In Technology Standardizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Primary Actors of Technology Standardization in the Manufacturing Industry

Moon

Lee

2021

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To date, discussions on standards and standards-related market issues have mainly been focused on market influence, such as a company's performance, trade, and technological innovation. Despite the fact that many studies have been conducted with a focus on technology standards, the ways in which primary actors of standards affect the market are yet to be fully investigated in extant studies. In this study, we investigate the primary actors in technology standardization by carrying out a systematic review and constructing a conceptual framework and concept maps of primary actors. Based on our analysis, we categorize primary actors, according to their roles and timing of engagement in standardization, as follows: Technology producers, standard-setters, regulators, and technology users. We illustrate each actor's detailed actions, motives, and difficulties with concept maps that are structured based on the SAO/P model, in order to elucidate why primary actors participate in standardization and how they act to achieve their goals or resolve difficulties. Based on our findings, we derive implications in terms of the strategic management of standardization activities in the manufacturing industry.

show abstract

Section: A Companies (Company-level)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B Concept Maps Of Primary Actors In Technology Standardizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Primary Actors of Technology Standardization in the Manufacturing Industry

Moon

Lee

2021

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this way, enterprises can seize the initiative in competition. Technology standardization has the characteristics of unity, stability and objectivity (Jiang et al ., 2012; Jiang, Zhao, Liu, and Chen, 2016). It is also a dynamic process for enterprises to accomplish their standardization strategies.…”

Section: Technology Standardization Modementioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of technology standardization mode for libraries based on game theory

Jiang

Zhao

et al. 2019

LHT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Internet of Things (IoT), a strategic emerging industry, has brought a new driving force to the global economic growth, as well as an effective solution to break the barrier of economic development. However, standards system of IoT is not yet mature, existing obvious overlapping and even conflicting standards, and enterprises lack mature technology standardization model, which severely restricts the structural upgrading and development of IoT. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In this regard, this study combs the research context of the IoT, technology standardization and competition behavior, and analyze technology standardization models of IoT by combining theory with practice. Using game theory and profit function, this paper analyzes the selection mechanism of standardization model of IoT enterprises, and explores practical application of these models using competitive behavior theory. Findings First, in the process of standardization, technology standardization model n enterprises is not single, nor is it immutable. Second, the trend of internationalization of technical standards is becoming more and more obvious. Third, if LoT enterprises want to achieve their own technology standardization, the corresponding competitive behavior is essential. Fourth, with the change of innovation capability and market forces, the competitive behavior of enterprises should be improved accordingly to better adapt to the changes of internal and external environment and ensure the realization of the standardization of enterprises. Fifth, if IoT attempts to achieve the same globalization as the internet, there must be a set of support systems. Originality/value Finally, some suggestions are given for the future development in the field of IoT. This study will provide some theoretical support for promoting the development of standards and enhancing the competitiveness of IoT enterprises.

show abstract

“…In the paper entitled ''The role, formation mechanism, and dynamic mechanism of action of technology standards in industrial systems'', the authors assert that industrial systems are a kind of complex system and that their evolvement mechanism fits a dissipative structure. By applying complex system theory, this paper explores the role of technology standards in industrial systems from the perspective of order parameters [9].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%