2021
DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-00210-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role and rule of relatedness in altruism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to account for the emergence of cooperative behaviors such as direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, networks of reciprocity, and group selection (Nowak, 2006). However, these are cases that do not satisfy the definition of altruism, given that these cooperation behaviors ultimately improve the fitness of the individual performing such behavior (Bourke, 2021). One of the main theories about how altruism could emerge in the natural world, that satisfies the definition of altruism as “cooperation with a cost”, is the kin selection or inclusive fitness theory , proposed by Hamilton (1964a; 1964b) and condensed in the Hamilton rule (equation 1).…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to account for the emergence of cooperative behaviors such as direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, networks of reciprocity, and group selection (Nowak, 2006). However, these are cases that do not satisfy the definition of altruism, given that these cooperation behaviors ultimately improve the fitness of the individual performing such behavior (Bourke, 2021). One of the main theories about how altruism could emerge in the natural world, that satisfies the definition of altruism as “cooperation with a cost”, is the kin selection or inclusive fitness theory , proposed by Hamilton (1964a; 1964b) and condensed in the Hamilton rule (equation 1).…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altruism has been defined as a behavior that reduces the expected reproductive performance (fitness) or survival of the agent performing the behavior, while simultaneously increasing the fitness of the recipient of the action (Kay et al, 2020; Floreano et al, 2008; Bourke, 2021; Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981). At first glance, this appears to be in conflict with the Darwinian conception of natural selection understood as “survival of the fittest” (Kay et al, 2020); nevertheless, this apparent paradox dissolves when we consider the genes of the individuals as the main unit for selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great many papers have been written on the topics of cooperation or coexistence of replicators (e.g., refs. 1,16,17,19). For n=2, coexistence occurs only when each replicator supports the other more than itself.…”
Section: Replicator Systems With Random Interaction Matrix Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replicator equation (Nowak 15 also calls it the equation of density-dependent selection) states: 1) where i,j,r,s=1...n and for all a ij holds: a ij ≥0. Here x stands for the relative frequency of replicators and a for the interaction coefficient describing the interaction between two replicators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%