2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00537.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role and Functioning of Cultural Scripts in Farming and Agriculture

Abstract: We advocate an increased utilisation of script theory in rural social research and suggest this will enhance understandings of the social life of farmers and other rural residents. We define a script as a culturally shared expression, story or common line of argument, or an expected unfolding of events, that is deemed to be appropriate or expected in a particular socially defined context, and that provides a rationale or justification for a particular issue or course of action. We suggest there are four types … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to implement an EMS would be an innovation for many business managers even though the internationally recognised EMS standard, ISO 14001, was ratified over 15 years ago. For some farmers, applying the concept of 'business manager' to themself would also be an innovation, as farmers frequently do not perceive themselves in this way (Vanclay, 2004a;Enticott and Vanclay, 2011;Vanclay and Enticott, 2011). Innovation in agriculture has evolved from single issue, technologically-focused approaches, through the use of a suite of related management issues or practices (for example, best management practices), to addressing the processes of management (including dealing with social factors such as staff management, peer relationships, and social norms).…”
Section: Innovation and Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, to implement an EMS would be an innovation for many business managers even though the internationally recognised EMS standard, ISO 14001, was ratified over 15 years ago. For some farmers, applying the concept of 'business manager' to themself would also be an innovation, as farmers frequently do not perceive themselves in this way (Vanclay, 2004a;Enticott and Vanclay, 2011;Vanclay and Enticott, 2011). Innovation in agriculture has evolved from single issue, technologically-focused approaches, through the use of a suite of related management issues or practices (for example, best management practices), to addressing the processes of management (including dealing with social factors such as staff management, peer relationships, and social norms).…”
Section: Innovation and Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Concerning nature (or a farm), though we have two e intertwined others e the generalized social other (GSO) and the generalized environmental other (GEO) (Weigert, 1991: 357). Farmers express their autonomy and farming self through cultural scripts of what it means to be a farmer (Vanclay and Enticott, 2011) and in contrast to the city or the office worker (see also Mendras, 1970: 172). They also develop this sense of an other within a particular frame e within the frame of their farm and within the sector of agriculture within certain contexts and relations.…”
Section: The Farming Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective technologies do not have fixed capacities; rather their material form, meaning and effectivity as heterogeneous assemblages are shaped through what Latour (1987) calls the 'trials of strength' between users and the behavioural 'scripts' built into them (Akrich, 1992). Unlike the symbolic interactionist approach to the 'cultural scripts' performed by farmers in responding to bovine TB (Vanclay and Enticott, 2011), this STS approach recognizes the power of objects themselves to object to the scripts projected upon them. It provides an alternative to neo-functionalist accounts of policy 'spill-over ' (Strøby Jensen, 2013;Zito, 1999) for explaining the capacity of audits and other regulatory instruments, like flood maps (Porter and Demeritt, 2012) or the British Cattle Tracing System (Singleton, 2012), to generate controversy and produce unintended consequences.…”
Section: Audit Assurance and Animal Welfare Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%