The risks of nation branding as crisis response: A case study of how the Danish government turned the Cartoon Crisis into a struggle with Globalization

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the limitations of organization-centric models for crisis communication in handling place crises. Two distinct types of place crisis are identified as what we respectively term the 'sudden' and the 'ongoing' type. We point out that place branding traditionally has been used to handle the latter type. We then demonstrate how the inspiration from corporate communication in place branding has led to a fixation on reputation, which becomes salient when place branding is used as crisis communication in sudden crisis. Here the corporate inspiration tends to rule out alternative strategies for handling crises based on 'societal models'. Through a case study of Denmark's so-called Cartoon Crisis we demonstrate how crisis communication falls short of coping aptly with the complexity of the crisis due to the branding-inspired translation from 'sudden' to 'ongoing' crisis. We thus argue that the Danish government's solution in nation branding aimed at the reputational implications failed to address the immediate consequences of the crisis vis-à-vis national security and exports. And that this solution in turn created the reputation as additional risk. We conclude that a broader societal perspective on crises therefore is needed in the emerging academic literature on place crisis communication.Place Branding and Public Diplomacy (2014) 10, 230-248.

Nation branding in the COVID-19 era: South Korea’s pandemic public diplomacy

“…There is a body of literature on place branding of tourist destinations in crisis and conflict (Avraham 2009 , 2018 ) as well as country-specific studies on Israel (Avraham 2009 ); Egypt (Avraham 2016 ); and Nepal (Ketter 2016 ). Other crisis-focused studies include the Danish government’s efforts to rebrand the country after the Denmark Cartoon Crisis (Rasmussen and Merkelsen 2014 ); Beijing’s public diplomacy to repair the country’s “Made in China” controversy (Cai et al 2009 ); the U.S. government’s efforts to repair its image after the 2008 financial crisis (Chua and Pang 2012 ); and the Greek government’s rebranding of the country after its financial crisis (Vaxevanidou 2016 , 2017 ).…”

Nation Branding as Sustainability Governance: A Comparative Case Analysis

“…As a form of public governance, nation branding is connected to, albeit distinct from, the practice of public diplomacy (Gilboa, 2008; Kaneva, 2011; Rasmussen & Merkelsen, 2014). Public diplomacy refers to international actors’ efforts to increase influence by engaging with foreign publics (Cull, 2008).…”

Branding India: Constructing a reputation for responsibility in the nuclear order

“…Thus, Melissa Aronczyk refers to nations as "always already brands" (Aronczyk 2008). It may be unwise to transfer the organization-centric models of place branding to international politics in an unreflective manner (Rasmussen and Merkelsen 2014).…”