The Risks of Autonomy: Empirical Evidence for the Necessity of a Balance Management in Promoting Organizational Innovativeness

Abstract

For the purpose of promoting innovativeness in organizations, the literature recommends more decentralization of power and more participative leadership as one dimension of empowerment and thus greater situation control for employees. In fact, however, increasing situation control involves specific risks (including co-ordination problems). Without concurrent integration to cushion these risks through orientation, consensus and trust, increasing situation control therefore leads not to a further increase in innovativeness but to a decline. This first empirical demonstration of the covert curvilinear relationship between situation control and innovativeness in n = 101 organizations reveals these risks. At the same time, it calls into question the widespread recommendations in the literature for action on innovation-friendly organization and leadership.

Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors

“…The strong positive relationship between job control and creativity, innovation, and personal initiative underscores the importance of granting autonomy and contradicts suggestions that high levels of control might be detrimental (Gebert, Boerner, & Lanwehr, 2003). Employees who have control over working procedures might feel more responsible for their work (Hackman & Oldham, 1975) and develop a more active approach to work (Frese et al, 1996).…”

Innovation Insights from North American Forest Sector Research: A Literature Review

“…Innovativeness is generally characterized as a function of adoption [16], creation [17] or a combination of the two. In other words, an innovative individual or firm tends to be an early adopter of new concepts, products and technologies; tends to develop or create new ideas, concepts and products; or some mix of the two.…”

Participative Management Style: A Tool to Enhance Quality Education

“…An extensive body of research has shown that participative management -defined as joint decision making or at least shared influence in decision making by a superior and his or her employees (Koopman and Wierdsma, 1998) -offers a variety of potential benefits to the overall school organization and to its employees (Day et al, 2005;Gebert et al, 2003). Nevertheless, studies (Sato et al, 2002) have also indicated that teacher involvement in the decision-making process can generate job-related stress and role ambiguity and can create tension and conflict among teachers, principals, and administrators.…”