2009
DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000350610.76367.be
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk of Unexplained Antepartum Stillbirth in Second Pregnancies Following Caesarean Section in the First Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we did not have any cases of stillbirth. The risk of unexplained stillbirth at 38 gestational weeks was reported to be about 0.05 per 1000 births among women with the history of cesarean delivery in a Scottish and a Canadian cohort study [ 14 , 15 ]. To measure the prevalence of 0.01–1% with sufficient accuracy and confidence, as many as 20,000 cases are needed [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we did not have any cases of stillbirth. The risk of unexplained stillbirth at 38 gestational weeks was reported to be about 0.05 per 1000 births among women with the history of cesarean delivery in a Scottish and a Canadian cohort study [ 14 , 15 ]. To measure the prevalence of 0.01–1% with sufficient accuracy and confidence, as many as 20,000 cases are needed [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, delivery by CS in the first pregnancy is reported to increase the risk of unexplained stillbirth in the second (15,16), implicating abnormal placentation and subsequent placental dysfunction as underlying mechanisms. Nevertheless, recent evidence failed to demonstrate increased antepartum stillbirth in cases of previous CS, attributing the contradictory results to differences in stillbirth definitions or uncontrolled confounding factors (17).…”
Section: Caesarean Section: Maternal / Foetal Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood et al observed an association between CS and stillbirth in the subsequent pregnancy in the first instance. However, after re‐analysis (including multivariate analysis for confounding factors) this association disappeared . In our analysis, we evaluated a low‐risk population and corrected for maternal age, race and socio‐economic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an increasing rate of CS, complications following a CS have been studied extensively because of the possible clinical implications for subsequent pregnancies. Increased risk of several obstetrical adverse outcomes for women with a history of CS have been reported, such as a higher risk of haemorrhage, placenta praevia, uterine rupture, repeat CS, but also HD and stillbirth . It has proven to be difficult in these studies to isolate the attributable effect of a CS on the risk of adverse outcome in a subsequent pregnancy from other (obstetrical) characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%