2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk of developing a second primary cancer in melanoma patients: A comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
2
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
61
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior studies, a majority of SPMs for cutaneous MM survivors represented an overall increased risk within the first 2–11 months subsequent to cutaneous MM diagnosis . Likely, increased medical surveillance in cutaneous MM survivors is presumed to be a major contributor to this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Consistent with prior studies, a majority of SPMs for cutaneous MM survivors represented an overall increased risk within the first 2–11 months subsequent to cutaneous MM diagnosis . Likely, increased medical surveillance in cutaneous MM survivors is presumed to be a major contributor to this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This has the added benefits of ongoing education on prevention and self-examination and identifying and managing treatment complications and toxicities, all while facilitating systematic data recording for future studies. This is not, however, to diminish the importance of routine dermatologic surveillance, as melanoma patients have a 9-fold increased risk of a second invasive primary melanoma 14 and a 4-fold increased risk of a non-melanoma skin cancer 15 . These recommendations intentionally leave flexibility for individual tailoring based on additional patient risk factors, such as age 1618 , sex 1719 , and tumor location 1719 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanomas represent <10% of all skin cancers, but they are responsible for the majority of skin cancer-related mortalities due to a high metastatic potential and therapeutic resistance (9,12,13). Previous studies demonstrated that risk factors for cutaneous melanoma depended upon the anatomical site and the clinicopathological variant (14), and that there was an inverse association between vitamin D blood levels and cutaneous thickness melanoma at diagnosis (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%