2008
DOI: 10.1163/2031356x-02102004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rise of a mediated state in northern Kenya: the Wajir story and its implications for state-building

Abstract: In an anarchic corner of northern Kenya in the mid-1990s, a collection of local non-state actors led by a women’s market group created an umbrella movement that came to establish an impressive level of peace and security across an entire region. The Kenyan government forged a formal relationship with this group in Wajir, essentially sub-contracting out important functions of local government to local civic leaders, and using its partnership with the Wajir group as a template for similar state-sanctioned govern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of its foundational authors produced research that countered depictions of them as eroding or failed polities with vast swaths of ungoverned, insecure territory. For example, Hagberg ( 2006 ) explored a charismatic leaders’ ‘making and unmaking’ of public authority in Burkina Faso; Menkhaus ( 2006 ) appraised the bargaining processes that lead to a ‘mediated state’ in areas in Sub‐Saharan Africa emerging from conflict; Olivier de Sardan ( 2008 ) examined ‘the practical norms’ of everyday governance beneath the state; Raeymaekers, Menkhaus, and Vlassenroot ( 2008 ) analysed ‘governance without government’ in situations of protracted crises; Hagmann and Péclard ( 2010 ) assessed how ‘negotiated statehood’ arises through contests over legitimacy; and Leonard and Samantar ( 2011 ) investigated the ‘local social contracts’ and ‘pro‐to‐state systems’ that can form where older regimes have retreated. Each showed how a variety of actors, from street‐level bureaucrats and security services to customary, business, and faith leaders, civil society organisations, vigilante and armed groups, claim positions of authority and, often creatively, attempt to introduce the ‘rules of the game’ that govern people by combining the provision of vital public goods with appeals to popular and emerging social norms (North, 1990 ).…”
Section: Public Authority In Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of its foundational authors produced research that countered depictions of them as eroding or failed polities with vast swaths of ungoverned, insecure territory. For example, Hagberg ( 2006 ) explored a charismatic leaders’ ‘making and unmaking’ of public authority in Burkina Faso; Menkhaus ( 2006 ) appraised the bargaining processes that lead to a ‘mediated state’ in areas in Sub‐Saharan Africa emerging from conflict; Olivier de Sardan ( 2008 ) examined ‘the practical norms’ of everyday governance beneath the state; Raeymaekers, Menkhaus, and Vlassenroot ( 2008 ) analysed ‘governance without government’ in situations of protracted crises; Hagmann and Péclard ( 2010 ) assessed how ‘negotiated statehood’ arises through contests over legitimacy; and Leonard and Samantar ( 2011 ) investigated the ‘local social contracts’ and ‘pro‐to‐state systems’ that can form where older regimes have retreated. Each showed how a variety of actors, from street‐level bureaucrats and security services to customary, business, and faith leaders, civil society organisations, vigilante and armed groups, claim positions of authority and, often creatively, attempt to introduce the ‘rules of the game’ that govern people by combining the provision of vital public goods with appeals to popular and emerging social norms (North, 1990 ).…”
Section: Public Authority In Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Making do' can entail collaborative arrangements -also called 'hybrid arrangements' -in which the state cedes certain responsibilities to local public authorities who are trusted and have greater means than the state to deliver. Menkhaus (2008) calls this a 'mediated state' model, in which a central government and informal local public authorities are not seen as antithetical but instead nested together in a negotiated division of labour. Such central state-local informal partnerships can contribute to building locally recognised and trusted modes of governance, which can be 'intrinsically messy, contradictory, illiberal, and constantly renegotiated deals' (ibid.…”
Section: 'Making Do' and Governance Through Multiple Public Authoritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Thomas Bierschenk (2010:2) points out, decades of detailed anthropological work on informal and non-state forms of organization have revealed that 'political order is possible without the state,' leading to a rethink of imported Weberian models of the rational bureaucratic state, increasingly regarded as an unnecessary luxury for Africa's fragile regions. On the other hand, emerging theoretical perspectives that focus on the notion of 'hybrid governance' suggest that violence and rival forms of order and authority may be part of more authentic processes of stateformation rather than symptoms of criminality and state failure (Boege et al 2009a;Hagmann & Peclard 2010;MacGinty 2010;Menkhaus 2008;Vlassenroot & Raeymaekers 2008). Non-state forms of order not only offer better value for money, but a new theoretical packaging suggests Smuggling ideologies they may be acceptable and even preferable paths to development (Boege et al 2009a:14).…”
Section: African Clandestine Economies and Model Shoppingmentioning
confidence: 99%