The rise, decline and current status of Canada's law reform agencies

Murphy, Gavin

doi:10.1080/03050718.2004.9986659

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Canadian insanity law reform during the 1970s and '80s was thus closely linked to the institutionalization of criminal law reform and the establishment of the LRCC. The creation of independent bodies like the LRCC aimed to address the disjointed approach to law reform that was the preceding standard (Murphy, 2004b). The LRCC took its cue from the British experience, although the first permanent law reform commission in either country was established in Ontario in 1964 (Murphy, 2009, p. 110).…”

Section: The Law Reform Commission Of Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Parliament established the LRCC in 1971 to systematically review and advise on the reform of the country's federal law (Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1972, p. 1). In his history of the institution, Murphy (2004b) points to the broader political and cultural climate as a major impetus for the founding of the Commission:…”

Section: The Law Reform Commission Of Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Minister of Justice John Turner, who oversaw the passing of the 1968-69 amendments, was also a strong advocate for a national law reform commission. Indeed, Murphy (2004b) (Murphy, 2004, pp. 905-906;Turner, 1968).…”

Section: The Law Reform Commission Of Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Commission's approach to insanity can be attributed, at least in part, to the historical milieux in which it emerged. As Murphy (2004b) explains, the creation of the LRCC reflected the social upheaval of the 1960s and early 1970s (p. 906), with Trudeau's Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1968-69 offering one indication of the swing towards moral pluralism in the country. These ethical divisions were paralleled by a distrust of the "traditional structures" of law reform, and the Commission provided an alternative approach (p. 906).…”

Section: Historicizing the Lrcc's Approach To Insanitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Making Sense of “Insanity”: A Genealogy of Canada’s Not Criminally Responsible Subject

Remington¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2014, Stephen Harper's Conservative government introduced the Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act. Amongst the handful of changes instituted by the legislation, the Act created the "high-risk accused" designation that, when applied, heightens measures in the detention of the accused and transfers authority for their release from provincial review boards to criminal courts. While the new laws reflect the Harper government's "tough on crime" policy, I start by noting how difficult it is to sum up my gratitude to everyone that helped me with this dissertation. To my supervisor, Dr. Dawn Moore, thank you for the years of kind and patient guidance; somehow you managed to lead without stifling. Dr. Diana Young, thank you for the many concise insights you provided along the way; you always had a way of getting at what I struggled to say. Dr. Jennifer Kilty, your conscientious and thoughtful consideration was unwavering throughout this process; I was consistently awed by your attention to my drafts and your incisive comments. This has been an uncomfortably self-centred process, one in which I've had to rely on the generosity of a number of individuals for which I could offer little in return. Dr. Bruce Arrigo and Dr. Josh Greenberg, thank you for the care and work you put into the examination of this thesis. Your efforts benefitted my own understanding of this project and made an angst-ridden day more enjoyable than I initially thought possible. Andrew Squires, you were of immense support throughout these years. Aside from the obvious administrative help, I always thoroughly enjoyed our chance discussions. Siobhan MacLean, thank you for your indispensable help in the final stages of this process -your care and concern was evident. And to the late Barb Higgins, thank you for your support; it was always a pleasure when our paths crossed.The historical nature of the project has meant that people at various libraries and archives have played an essential role. John Court, you not only were incredibly thorough in helping me with my particular needs (you took on my own questions like they were your own), but you were also so gracious in involving me in the process wherever possible (even where I may have only served to complicate it). Thank you to Paul Leatherdale as well. While so much archival material was inaccessible amidst a global pandemic, you went above and beyond to provide me access to the resources I needed.To my folks, who are nothing if not supportive, thank you for the seemingly bottomless well of encouragement and understanding that extends beyond this dissertation. Waylon, I couldn't ask for a better best friend. And finally, Sarah, this simply would not have been done without you. From your active support to just letting me be so self-involved over these years, I hope you realize how important you are in my life.

show abstract

Section: The Law Reform Commission Of Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Law Reform Commission Of Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%