2013
DOI: 10.15845/njsr.v4i0.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rise and fall of cash for care in Norway: changes in the use of child-care policies

Abstract: The cash-for-care scheme was introduced in 1998 in Norway. During the first period after its introduction, the percentage of users was high at 91 per cent. Since 2005, however, the use has decreased substantially year by year. Thus, the use of cash for care has changed over the 15 years it has existed. In this article we take these changes as our point of departure and analyse more closely what we might call 'the rise and fall of the cash-for-care scheme' in Norway. Over the last 15 to 20 years, Norway has bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The emphasis on women's participation in the labour market has also been encouraged within feminist perspectives, which have emphasized economic independence as key to women's liberation (Hernes, ). Accordingly, welfare politics have been shaped to accommodate gender equality in childcare, for example, through extensive parental leave and a father quota (Annfelt, ; Bungum and Kvande, ; Kvande, ). Nevertheless, in Norway (as elsewhere in western Europe and the US), ‘opting out’ has become an established expression to refer to women who have left their careers to become full‐time stay‐at‐home mothers (Blair‐Loy, ; Gill, ; Gill and Scharff, ; Kitterød, ; Stone, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis on women's participation in the labour market has also been encouraged within feminist perspectives, which have emphasized economic independence as key to women's liberation (Hernes, ). Accordingly, welfare politics have been shaped to accommodate gender equality in childcare, for example, through extensive parental leave and a father quota (Annfelt, ; Bungum and Kvande, ; Kvande, ). Nevertheless, in Norway (as elsewhere in western Europe and the US), ‘opting out’ has become an established expression to refer to women who have left their careers to become full‐time stay‐at‐home mothers (Blair‐Loy, ; Gill, ; Gill and Scharff, ; Kitterød, ; Stone, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Brasil, a licença-maternidade é de quatro meses, podendo chegar a seis meses, e a licença-paternidade é de cinco dias, podendo chegar a 20 dias, para servidores públicos e trabalhadores de empresas participantes do Programa Empresa Cidadã (Lei 13.257/2016). Dessa forma, diferentemente de outros países, como os nórdicos (Bungum & Kvande, 2013), o Brasil não conta com políticas específicas que permitam às famílias optar por ampliar ou distribuir de forma mais equânime o período de licença-maternidade e de licença-paternidade. Assim, a diferença do tempo estabelecido para essas licenças também impacta na divisão de trabalho parental, referendando papeis mais tradicionais de gênero nos cuidados do bebê.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Guaranteeing a place in day care for all children has been prioritized by the Norwegian government throughout 2000s, and day care institutions gradually became cheaper and more accessible than before. Recent studies document a general fall in the use of the home care allowance, although it remains popular for minoritized mothers who are marginalized in the labour market (Bungum & Kvande 2013).…”
Section: Child-care Becoming a Social Citizenship Rightmentioning
confidence: 99%