Critical Indigenous Rights Studies 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315189925-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rights of indigenous peoples in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the friendly settlement proceedings, the states of Argentina, Brazil, Honduras, and Panama hesitated to accept their duty to protect the right of Indigenous peoples to enjoy and use of natural resources to which they have traditionally had access such as rivers, lakes, beaches, coastal seas and hydrobiological resources when these were in areas not exclusively occupied by Indigenous communities. Subsequently, the abovementioned judgments established this international obligation, further developing the I/A Court H. R.’s jurisprudence on the matter (Herencia-Carrasco, 2018).…”
Section: Findings: Timeframes In Judgments and Supervision Of Complia...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the friendly settlement proceedings, the states of Argentina, Brazil, Honduras, and Panama hesitated to accept their duty to protect the right of Indigenous peoples to enjoy and use of natural resources to which they have traditionally had access such as rivers, lakes, beaches, coastal seas and hydrobiological resources when these were in areas not exclusively occupied by Indigenous communities. Subsequently, the abovementioned judgments established this international obligation, further developing the I/A Court H. R.’s jurisprudence on the matter (Herencia-Carrasco, 2018).…”
Section: Findings: Timeframes In Judgments and Supervision Of Complia...mentioning
confidence: 99%