The revised suicide crisis inventory (SCI-2): Validation and assessment of prospective suicidal outcomes at one month follow-up

Comparative clinical utility of screening for Suicide Crisis Syndrome versus suicidal ideation in relation to suicidal ideation and attempts at one‐month follow‐up

“…Respondents rate the intensity of each symptom (e.g., “Did you feel a lot of emotional turmoil in your gut?”, “Did you feel that ideas kept turning over and over in your mind and they wouldn't go away?”, “Did you feel there is no escape?”) based on their worst feelings over the past few days on a 5‐point scale ranging from 0 ( Not at all ) to 4 ( Extremely ). The SCI‐2 and its related scales (e.g., the SCI, the STS) have demonstrated strong psychometric properties in previous research (Barzilay et al, 2020; Yaseen et al, 2014), including a unidimensional model fit based on confirmatory factor analyses (Bloch‐Elkouby et al, 2021). For the purposes of the present study, individuals who scored above a cut‐off score of 163 (which was determined based on classification accuracy analyses in previous research; Bloch‐Elkouby et al, 2021) were classified as screening positive for SCS; those who scored below this cut‐point were classified as screening negative for SCS.…”

“…The SCI‐2 and its related scales (e.g., the SCI, the STS) have demonstrated strong psychometric properties in previous research (Barzilay et al, 2020; Yaseen et al, 2014), including a unidimensional model fit based on confirmatory factor analyses (Bloch‐Elkouby et al, 2021). For the purposes of the present study, individuals who scored above a cut‐off score of 163 (which was determined based on classification accuracy analyses in previous research; Bloch‐Elkouby et al, 2021) were classified as screening positive for SCS; those who scored below this cut‐point were classified as screening negative for SCS. Internal consistency in this sample was very high ( α = 0.97).…”

Recent research advances in identification and prevention of youth suicide risk

“…The concept of imminent risk, however, focuses on the question when is the risk?-that is, on identifying the acute psychological processes leading an individual to a suicidal act at a specific moment. In the last 5 years, two suicide-specific syndromes have been introduced to address this question, each with a growing research body and support among adult populations: Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance [33,34] and Suicidal Crisis Syndrome (SCS) [35][36][37]. A recent conceptual analysis [38 & ] compared their clinical utility with the traditional risk factors and concluded that the two proposals offer transdiagnostic classification of acute suicidal states and new validated tools to objectively measure them.…”

Az öngyilkossági rizikó becslése a klinikai gyakorlatban.

“…Egy másik kutatás eredményei alapján is a csapdába esettség érzése és a mentális fájdalom bizonyult kulcstünetnek, melyeknek közvetlen szerepük van a szuicid gondolatok és a komplex tünettan más összetevőinek (mint például ruminatio, pánik, halálfélelem) kialakulásában [48]. A kérdőívnek már egy 60 tételes verziója is publikálásra került (SCI-2), melynek kiváló a belső konzisztenciája, jó a konvergens, a diszkrimináns és a konkrét validitása is [49], azonban lényegesen hosszabb az előző verziónál, ez pedig némileg korlátozza rutinszerű alkalmazhatóságát.…”

“…Ennek során a Pub-Med adatbázis a "suicidal crisis syndrome" kifejezésre 18 találatot adott. Ebből a 18-ből 13 empirikus kutatás [8,[44][45][46][47][48][49][51][52][53][54][55][56]. (Szerk.…”